Tag Archives: nicolas cage

Opening This Week (28 Feb – 06 Mar, 2011)

28 Feb

This past weekend proved quite a success for K.N.O.T.S., Nic Cage’s $50 million dollar exploitation film (on more than one level) raked in a measly $5.3 million, which is less than Season of the Witch, again proving that Cage may not be as bankable as some predict. The weekend was topped by Gnomeo and Juliet ($14.2M), continuing a nice little run during the weak February film season. The Farrelly Brothers’ new comedy, Hall Pass (13.4M) came in second, with Unknown ($12.4M) coming in third.

Here’s what we got coming out this week:

The Adjustment Bureau

Rated: PG-13

Starring: Matt Damon, Emily Blunt, John Slattery, Terrence Stamp

Director: George Nolfi

Synopsis from IMDB: The affair between a politician and a ballerina is affected by mysterious forces keeping the lovers apart.

Trailer:

Chris’ Take: While the film looks exciting, my guess is that it will be merely entertaining without providing anything new to the thriller/conspiracy genre. It is based on a Philip K. Dick novel, which could bode well for its structure, and his stories have a pretty high success rate.

Well....for the most part.

Plus, the cast is pretty solid, so it has a lot of things going for it. Early in the week, it has a 67% on RottenTomatoes, which will probably change throughout the course of the week, but the question is which way will it go?

Rango

Rated: PG

Starring: Johnny Depp, Abigail Breslin, Isla Fisher, Alfred Molina

Director: Gore Verbinski

Synopsis from IMDB: A chameleon that aspires to be a swashbuckling hero finds himself in a Western town plagued by bandits and is forced to literally play the role in order to protect it.

Trailer:

Chris’ Take: While the production of the film looks interesting, the plot does not. In fact, the main character sounds downright irritating and his face looks like it was taken from the movie poster for Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas. I don’t expect much out of this one, but I’m sure it was a lot of fun to make.

Beastly

Rated: PG-13

Starring: Alex Pettyfer, Vanessa Hudgens, Neil Patrick Harris, Mary-Kate Olsen

Director: Daniel Barnz

Synopsis from IMDB: A modern-day take on the “Beauty and the Beast” tale where a New York teen is transformed into a hideous monster in order to find true love.

Trailer:

Chris’ Take: Well, I guess the Twilight crowd needed something to tide them over until Red Riding Hood, another adaptation of a fairy tale. I am still not sure whether I would want to see this emo version of Beauty and the Beast, or Beautician and the Beast.

 Take Me Home Tonight

Rated: R

Starring: Topher Grace, Dan Fogler, Anna Faris, Teresa Palmer

Director: Michael Dowse

Synopsis from IMDB: Follow an aimless college grad who pursues his dream girl at a wild Labor Day weekend party. He, his twin sister and their best friend struggle with their burgeoning adulthood over the course of the night.

Trailer:

Chris’ Take: This looks like a run-of-the-mill comedy, but there is something endearing about it to me. I don’t think it will be anything spectacular, especially with Dan Fogler as one of the stars, but maybe it is the 80’s soundtrack bringing back memories of The Wedding Singer that attracts me to this film.

Limited Releases

I Saw the Devil

Rated: Unrated

Starring: Byung-hun Lee, Min-sik Choi, Ho-jin Jeon

Director: Ji-woon Kim

Synopsis from IMDB: A secret agent tracks a serial killer who murdered his fiancée.

Trailer:

Chris’ Take: While this does look pretty badass, it doesn’t look like anything we haven’t seen in every other revenge flick. Still, it looks like it could be the best action film released in the U.S. so far this year.

Bereavement

Rated: R

Starring: Michael Biehn, Alexandra Dadarrio, John Savage

Director: Stevan Mena

Synopsis from IMDB: The horrific account of 6 year old Martin Bristol, abducted from his backyard swing and forced to witness the brutal crimes of a deranged madman.

Trailer:

Chris’ Take: The premise for this film is pretty disturbing and it looks like it is in the torture porn genre, but it is hard to tell. I would be interested in seeing this for the exploration of the psychological trauma this 6 year old kid would suffer in his later years. The film has a 7.5 on IMDB, but the RottenTomatoes reviews are mediocre. Probably a Netflix rental, but there is no rush.

Join K.N.O.T.S. (Keep Nic Off The Screen)!

24 Feb

by Chris Petersen

One of the first series I did on this blog listed the five actors that I can’t believe keep getting work, and at #1 was the bane of the cinema, Nicolas Cage, who has taken his recent efforts to ward off bankruptcy out on the average moviegoer. Instead of being subjected to one bad Nic Cage movie, we are subjected to three or four a year. Heck, it is February and we are already at 2!

All this is not to say that every once in a while, in blind squirrel-like fashion, he stumbles upon a decent film (Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans and Kick-Ass were good for him, and Drive Angry is actually at 62% on RottenTomatoes), but more than likely he is going to produce an absolute dud and, on his name alone, steal the money of people who have lived under a rock for the last 15 years.

And no, we're not talking about this rock.

I am saying that I have had enough. I can’t take it and I need your help to let Hollywood know that we will no longer be fooled by his name and his high school vagrant hair. I am starting the official society of K.N.O.T.S. (Keep Nic Off The Screen). A group dedicated to anti-Cage sentiment and the eventual removal of him from the big screen, particularly from action films.

I mean, who was the guy that looked at him and said, “This guy is a badass.”

Probably the same guy who thought this was a good idea.

He does alright when he plays an everyman, such as Adaptation or The Family Man, but he is just a disaster in action films, which is unfortunately what he does the most. I think the bad heavily outweighs the good with him, and rather than risk having our cinemas spoiled by his action film atrocities, I would just like to remove him from movies entirely.

Don’t think I am such a bad guy for leaving Nic Cage in the gutter when he is bankrupt.

He presumably already lives in a gutter.

I think he could be successful in many other fields. He seemed pretty convincing as a salesman in The Family Man. I could also see him in construction, or as a manager at McDonald’s.

But he is not quite Chick-Fil-A caliber.

If you want to be part of this movement, like this post at the top of the screen and place your comments in the area provided below.

Opening This Week (21 – 27 Feb, 2011)

22 Feb

The cinematic drolls of February continue this week with what looks like a bunch of weak releases, and one that reunites Nicolas Cage with his worst type of role…action hero. With those ominous words let’s see what else is on the docket:

Hall Pass

Rated: R

Starring: Owen Wilson, Jason Sudeikis, Jenna Fischer, Christina Appelgate

Director: The Farrelly Brothers

Synopsis from IMDB: A married man is granted the opportunity to have an affair by his wife. Joined in the fun by his best pal, things get a little out of control when both wives start engaging in extramarital activities as well.

Trailer:

Chris’ Take: While the Farrelly Brothers achieved great success with There’s Something About Mary and, to me, have a classic comedy with Dumb and Dumber, all of their other comedic efforts such as Shallow Hal, The Heartbreak Kid, Stuck On You and Fever Pitch were all mediocre at best. Seeing that their last good comedy was over ten years ago, I don’t have a whole lot of confidence in this one, even though I think that Jason Sudeikis is an underrated comedian.

Drive Angry 3D

Rated: R

Starring: Nicolas Cage, William Fichtner, Amber Heard, Billy Burke

Director: Patrick Lussier

Synopsis from IMDB: A vengeful father escapes from hell and chases after the men who killed his daughter and kidnapped his granddaughter.

Trailer:

Chris’ Take: Nicolas Cage already plagued the screen earlier this year in an action film, Season of the Witch, and here he is to violate our eyes and ears again. The premise for the film is rather flimsy, but it does have hints of the exploitation films of the 1970’s. RottenTomatoes has it at 63%, which is really surprising since Cage’s recent Tomatometer scores have been between 6% and 40%, but it is also early in the week, so I expect that to go down. To make matters worse, it is in 3D, so essentially whoever watches this will be paying twice as much to be more disappointed.

Limited Releases

Shelter

Rated: R

Starring: Julianne Moore, Jonathan Rhys Myers, Jeffrey DeMunn, Frances Conroy

Director: Mans Marlind, Bjorn Stein

Synopsis from IMDB: A female forensic psychiatrist discovers that all of one of her patient’s multiple personalities are murder victims. She will have to find out what’s happening before her time is finished.

Trailer:

Chris’ Take: For every The Kids are All Right, Julianne Moore has her The Forgotten. This one looks like she is returning to the latter rather than the former. While I did like Identity, I was hoping that the writer, Michael Cooney, would branch out a bit more because he has a lot of promise. Hopefully, this is still a fresh take on the schizophrenic thriller.

 

 

An Open Letter to Antoine Fuqua

15 Feb

Dear Mr. Fuqua,

I apologize for publishing this letter in a public forum, but despite numerous attempts over the weekend none of my voicemails have been returned.  First of all, if you are reading this allow me to say thank you for visiting our page.  Chris and I are always excited to find those associated with the industry that fuels our work pay attention to the voice of the consumer, even if it is mostly hate mail from Nicolas Cage.

Dear Chris, I hate your stinking guts. You make me vomit. You're scum between my toes! Love, Nicolas.

I can’t express to you how excited I was to hear that you will soon be directing a biopic on Tupac Shakur.  As I have previously expressed on this site, Tupac is my favorite musical artist, one I have followed since my childhood.  I cannot think of any other director I would prefer to bring his life story to the big screen for this generation of movie goers.  As I understand it, Mr. Fuqua, the role of Tupac Shakur has yet to be cast and with shooting to begin in April/May I’m sure you are actively pursuing a suitable actor for that role.  I would like to officially enter myself for consideration.

To ensure that my candidacy for the role is taken seriously, allow me to tell you a little bit about myself.  I am a 25 year old white male who currently lives in Virginia Beach, Va.  I am 5’10” tall and weigh approximately 165 lbs.  While I have no cinematic film experience, I once played Martin Vanderhof in a high school adaptation of “You Can’t Take it With You”.  I apologize for not including a headshot with this letter but you know how it is for bloggers these days, if the world knew what I looked like it’d only be a matter of time before I was assaulted by Will.I.Am.

I can't believe Will.I.Am did that to his hair...

Now I know what you’re thinking after reading that description, 25 is the perfect age for the role.  I am aware that Tupac was tragically gunned down at the age of 25, and as your film will primarily focus on the last days of his life, I fit the age demographic perfectly.  However, that is not the only attribute that should be acknowledged when considering me for this role.  I have compiled a short list of things that you may want to take into account.

Height and Weight

As I said previously, I am currently 5’10” tall and approximately 165 lbs.  At the time of Tupac’s arrest for sexual assault he was listed as 5’11” but in actually he was closer to 5’9” -5’10” tall.  Also, chronicled in the popular Tupac song “Str8 Ballin” is the lyric:

“And they say how do you survive weighin’ 165”

This of course is referring to the weight of the late rapper, which coincidentally is identical to my own.

 

Life Experiences

While I cannot argue that my life experiences were identical to the rappers, as an actor I am able to use my own life experiences to identify with some of the hardships he went through.  For example, Tupac’s mother was a high ranking Black Panther who was arrested and imprisoned while she was pregnant with him.  She stood trial without representation and pleaded her own case.  She was subsequently found not guilty and released.  My mother experienced a similar incident, one that shaped both my perception of her and my own life in the process.  She was kicked out of the PTA when I was in second grade for laughing at a student during a spelling bee.  She was found to be in violation of no rules or regulations after petitioning the board, as apparently it is not inappropriate to laugh at a child during a PTA event if you gave birth to said individual.

That's not fair! Rizzuto's not a word! He's a baseball player!

In 1994, Tupac was shot five times coming out of an elevator at Time Square’s Quad Studios in New York City.  Recently, I decided to independently re-enact the incident with my fifteen year old brother (I take my method acting very seriously).  As I was taking the trash out during a visit to his house, my brother unexpectedly shot me five times with his unregistered Crosman C11 BB Gun.  There has been a long standing beef between us ever since, chronicled through various diss records.

Karl Kani jeans sold seperately

 

Influences and Legal Controversy

While I have never been incarcerated, had any wrongful death lawsuits brought against me, or been the center of congressional hearings; I, like Tupac, have been the center of some legal controversy.  In 2002 I took a high school literature class entitled “Great Works”.  During the class, we were required to read and write an analysis on Niccolò Machiavelli‘s “The Prince”.  Up until this point in the class, all of my previous papers had been returned with perfect marks.  Coming under fire from my classmates that my teacher showed me favoritism because she was a fan of my slam poetry program on the morning announcements, I decided to submit this paper under the alias Lesane Parish Crooks.  Although the paper received an “A”, I was given a failing grade because my teacher had no proof that I had written the paper.  When given the opportunity to resubmit the paper, I submitted the same paper under my own name assuming she’d then realize I was the original author.  Instead I was found guilty of plagiarizing Lesane Parish Crooks.  I was sentenced to two weeks detention for the infraction where I wrote a “coming of age” screenplay.

Physical Appearance

Even though I’m the same height and weight as the late rapper, I understand that my physical appearance may not be identical.  It has taken years of counseling but I do realize that I am white, something that may present a challenge when playing this role.  However, as any film enthusiast knows, Kirk Lazarus received his unprecedented sixth Academy Award for playing Sergeant Lincoln Osiris in Tropic Blunder: The True Story Behind The Making Of The Most Expensive Fake True War Movie Ever.  I have attempted to contact Kirk about the skin pigmentation procedure he underwent for that film but have yet to hear back from his people.  I’m sure that casting me in the role as Tupac would garner the same attention from the Academy that Kirk received. 

I don't read the script, the script reads me

 

Mr. Fuqua, I hope that after reading this letter you can agree that there is no better individual for the role of Tupac Shakur in your upcoming film than myself.  If my argument has not completely convinced you, I would be more than happy to accompany you to South America where we can ask Tupac in person.

 Sincerely,

Brian “Pac” Sostak

Lindsay Lohan to appear in “The Man of Steel”?

8 Feb

Surely as the man tagged to helm the next film in the Superman franchise Zack Snyder understands the expression “Movie Kryptonite”, so I can’t imagine there is much truth to this rumor.  However, with February picking up where January left off as movie news purgatory, and with The Man of Steel being one of the most anticipated films of 2012, this is currently newsworthy.  Hardly reputable online tabloid TMZ reported that Lindsay Lohan is in talks to be cast in an unspecified role for Warner Bros reboot of the Superman franchise.  It has been confirmed that Lindsay is not up for the part of Lois Lane, but typecasting would suggest she’s one of Lex Luthor’s cell-mates.

Ms. Lohan, what are you in for this time?

While it’s hard for me to believe that Snyder, Nolan, and company would consider casting Lohan in such a high-profile film, especially considering her track record for irresponsible behavior (not to mention poor box office showings), there has already been some controversy surrounding the casting of this project.  There have been conflicting reports regarding Kristen Stewart’s link to the film and why she will not appear as Lois Lane.  The Snyder camp suggests they were interested in Stewart for the role but never offered it to her, while Stewart’s camp claims she was offered the role but turned it down.  Regardless of whether or not Stewart was offered the part or not, consensus seems to be she was considered which, combined with the Lohan rumor, makes that two suspect casting choices in a row. 

Tomorrow's news: The two frontrunners for General Zod

With filming for The Man of Steel to begin this summer, it is likely we will see a lot more news regarding the casting of this film; one role that will need to be cast will be the Kryptonian outlaw Ursa.  This news comes as a surprise not because anyone cares about Ursa, but more so because it seems unlikely the film will have her as a villain without General Zod.  We’ve seen General Zod before in Superman II and with him being one of the more well-known villains in the Superman universe, it has been long speculated that he may appear in this film. 

Ursa - AKA Kryptonian Outlaw #2

Surely we can’t believe every rumor we read on the internet, especially with high-profile films like The Man of Steel, a lot of these reports could exist just to throw fans off and garner free publicity and build anticipation.  However, many of the rumors floating around this project aren’t to the liking of Superman fans (this writer included) so the skepticism is starting to build.  What do you think, can a Superman film succeed if it features Lindsay Lohan?  Does the character Ursa mean we’ll also see General Zod, and are you excited about this?  Superman: The Man of Steel is slated for release at the end of 2012.

Film in Depth: Scott Pilgrim vs. The World

18 Jan

 Living in Babylon: Our Yearning for Home (Pt. 1)

by Jeremy “Jerome” Petersen          

When it comes to conversation on movies, most people appear to prefer immediacy–what are the rumors about movie X, which “it” girl will be in the next “it” film, is this movie I haven’t seen yet worth watching, etc. While such discussion is certainly an enjoyable pursuit, it often comes at the expense of long looks at works of art that highlight important cultural concerns. This piece will be an attempt at doing so, and will hopefully highlight some of things that Hollywood is articulating well when they are not trying to find a movie role that actually fits Nicolas Cage

FAILURE

Taking a look back at some of the film and television that I have watched over the last few months as I have dealt with the usual upheaval and angst that comes with moving to a new place, I have been struck by the ways that many of today’s filmmakers express a sense of rootlessness and alienation. While the notion that very few–if any–people live perfectly contented lives is hardly innovative, the ways that the characters in works like Scott Pilgrim vs. the World, Mad Men, and Up in the Air work out these concerns sheds some light in new ways on what many Americans yearn for and how we try (mostly ineffectively) to achieve it.

In addressing this topic, I must acknowledge some preconceived notions that will hopefully not cause people to discard any of the conclusions I’ll draw here. As a Christian–and not just in the cultural sense–I view history in light of the Biblical grand narrative of creation in perfection and fall through disobedience. We experience this fall through physical decay, a general feeling of rootlessness, and a continual gap between desire and reality, the sort of “quiet desperation” that Thoreau identified in nineteenth-century Americans. That being said, I wouldn’t write this if I thought that I was twisting in any way the three works I’m highlighting; in fact, part of what initially interested me in this topic is how the Mad Men Season One episode “Babylon” expresses this alienation through the Bible’s Psalm 137.

I’ll argue that the film and television highlight the human response to this sense of rootlessness: to seek situations in which we feel at once intimately connected, cared for (not necessarily in the emotional sense), and released from the struggles of everyday life. For the purposes of this piece, I’ll refer to this collection of longings as the search for transcendent belonging, a sort of sustained, joyful connectedness. Even if people don’t quite know how to express what they are looking for (perhaps referring to it as “home” or “rest”), we all recognize on some level that we are lacking something. Popular music like Daughtry’s “I’m Going Home”–amusingly packaged as a “Christian” song on some stations with nothing more than the addition of uplifting string notes–often expresses this. In Daughtry’s case, the singer’s jubilation at going to “the place where I belong / Where love has always been enough for me” glosses over the fact that, if he is “going” there, he is certainly not there yet.

The recent (and underappreciated) film Scott Pilgrim vs. The World, directed by Edgar Wright (Shaun of the Dead, Hot Fuzz) and based on the series of graphic novels by Bryan Lee O’Malley, deals more self-consciously with this sort of existential homesickness. The protagonist’s last name implies at the outset his rootlessness–he is on a quest for a nebulous sense of place. The details of the plot bear this out. Pilgrim (Michael Cera), 22, is “between jobs at the moment” and obliviously relies on the generosity and forbearance of his friends (and the occasional quarter from his seventeen-year-old girlfriend) for shelter, food, and arcade money; he lives in an apartment with a homosexual roommate (Kieran Culkin) who, as the initial shot of the apartment’s interior humorously shows, owns everything in the place except for Scott’s clothes and “lame” poster; and Scott spends his time–aside from the band practices in which he is only moderately invested–brushing up on his indie credentials by perusing the clothing racks at Goodwill, flipping through CDs at the music store, and playing games at the arcade.

Scott’s response to his situation is perhaps the most instinctive, as he clumsily seeks a serious romantic relationship with the appropriately off-beat Ramona (who, frankly, has little to recommend her other than her dyed hair and vague dark side). Before Scott’s showdown with Ramona’s seven evil exes,

NOT Ex-Boyfriends

what Scott finds attractive about her is represented by an open door that the pair float towards after their first date. While this is associated in the context of the story with Ramona’s apartment, the door, through which the pair enter to escape a snowstorm, represents what Scott is really searching for–a place filled with both literal and relational warmth. The lyrics of the Beachwood Sparks‘ “By Your Side,” most prominent when Scott and Ramona (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) first kiss, reinforce this: “Oh, when you’re cold, I’ll be there / Hold you tight to me.” Scott’s first night in Ramona’s apartment–while involving a cup of tea, a warm blanket, and a half-clothed make-out session–is not completely fulfilling, but the promise of it is enough to motivate Scott to fight the League of Evil Exes. Only after defeating them and earning the Powers of Love and Self-respect is Scott able to reach a mature relationship with Ramona. The rather thinly sketched relational growth between the two is apparent almost exclusively through the images of the couple at Ramona’s door that bracket their romantic arc. In the first of these, Ramona leads Scott through the door as Scott is borne away with the hormonal euphoria of a new relationship; in the second, he and Ramona walk calmly through the door on an equal footing, as Scott has realized after seven duels that relationships are just as much about struggle as ecstasy.

 

 

 

Of course, Scott Pilgrim, like most coming-of-age films, prefers a neat conclusion to the rootlessness of youth in the form of a consummated relationship rather than dealing with the messiness of adulthood. What Scott fails to see–and that the more philosophically complex (if less visually stimulating) Mad Men and Up in the Air do–is that what he thinks will bring his life comfort, meaning, and a sense of place will lead to its own problems and ultimately be much less satisfying than he believes. In the next part of this essay (hopefully coming sometime in the next week), I’ll look at some of the ways that Don Draper and Ryan Bingham try to cope with these concerns as established adults.

Opening This Week (10 – 16 Jan, 2011)

10 Jan

Even though Nic Cage thought he had the box office all to himself during the first week in January, he fell short to not one, but two films, True Grit ($15.0 M)  and Little Fockers ($13.8 M), who were in their third week of release, and raked in a measly $10 million.

Nic Cage spent his salary on booze and a better cardboard box.

I think we can expect to see that significantly drop next week, maybe (hopefully) off the Top Ten, especially since it received an atrocious 4% Tomatometer at RottenTomatoes.com.

This week promises to be a little better, with two great directors putting out some wide releases. Here is what is on the docket for this week:

The Green Hornet

Rated: PG-13

Starring: Seth Rogen, Jay Chou, Cameron Diaz, Christoph Waltz

Director: Michel Gondry

Synopsis from IMDB: Following the death of his father, Britt Reid, heir to his father’s large company, teams up with his late dad’s assistant Kato to become a masked crime fighting team.

Trailer:

Chris’ Take: While it looks a little corny and Mythbusters already beat up its plausibility pretty well (which can be seen here), I have a lot of faith in Michel Gondry. Enough faith that I put The Green Hornet on my 10 Most Anticipated Films of 2011. I really hope Gondry (Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, The Science of Sleep, and the really cool White Stripes music video) doesn’t let me down on this one, but with his visual innovation and dedication to making good films, I don’t think he will disappoint. If nothing else, it should be entertaining.

The Dilemma

Rated: PG-13

Starring: Vince Vaughn, Kevin James, Winona Ryder, Channing Tatum

Director: Ron Howard

Synopsis from IMDB: A man discovers that his best friend’s wife is having an affair.

Trailer:

Chris’ Take: I am on the fence about this one. Vince Vaughn and Kevin James always seem to play the same people, just transported into different films with different premises, so I am inclined to think that this will be more of the same. However, the trailer was pretty humorous and Ron Howard rarely disappoints.

Emphasis on "rarely"

This one would probably be a pretty safe bet for this weekend.

Limited Releases

Ong Bak 3

Rated: R

Starring: Tony Jaa, Dan Chupong

Director: Tony Jaa, Panna Rittikrai

Synopsis from IMDB: Ong Bak 3 picks up where Ong Bak 2 had left off. Tien is captured and almost beaten to death before he is saved and brought back to the Kana Khone villagers. There he is taught meditation and how to deal with his Karma, but very soon his arch rival returns challenging Tien for a final duel.

Foreign Trailer:

English Trailer:

Chris’ Take: If you watch both of the trailers, they look like two completely different films. If you watch the English one, which is more than a minute shorter, you will think that the whole film is a fight scene involving two elephants and a lot of people, not much a story. The foreign trailer makes a lot more sense and I can’t even understand what they are saying. Apparently, there was an Ong Bak and an Ong Bak 2, but I did not have the privilege of seeing those. If you’re in the mood for some martial arts shenanigans, check out Ong Bak 3, it will deliver the goods.

The Heart Specialist

Rated: Unrated

Starring: Wood Harris, Zoe Saldana, Brian J. White, Mya

Director: Dennis Cooper

Synopsis from RT: A Harvard Medical School graduate (Brian White) arrives for his internship at a hospital in South Florida. When the Chief Resident (Wood Harris) discovers that the Intern has actually come to recapture the girl that got away, he and his girlfriend (Zoe Saldana) conspire to teach a lesson not just about medicine but about true love.

Trailer:

Chris’ Take: Um…..I think I’ll be skipping this one. Considering it was actually released in 2006 only to be silently panned before Zoe Saldana blew up in Avatar, it looks like they are trying to re-release it, hoping to bank a bit on her name recognition now. I couldn’t find any pre-reviews, but out of 63 votes on IMDB, it received a rating of 3.5…..so, view at your own risk.

Barney’s Version

Rated: R

Starring: Dustin Hoffman, Paul Giamatti, Rosamund Pike, Minnie Driver

Director: Richard J. Lewis

Synopsis from IMDB: The picaresque and touching story of the politically incorrect, fully lived life of the impulsive, irascible and fearlessly blunt Barney Panofsky.

Trailer:

Chris’ Take: This film has a great cast, headed up by the underrated Paul Giamatti and looks like it is beautiful and humorous. I think out of the limited releases this week, this should be the one to try to track down.

Opening This Week (03 – 09 Jan, 2011)

3 Jan

Happy New Year, everyone! Several films at the end of the year left hope for things to come in the future (even though the box office numbers may not show it). Anyway, January is a very slow time of the year for films, but every now and then there is something to keep you warm during the dead of Winter. Here are the wide releases for this week:

Season of the Witch

Rated: PG-13

Starring: Nicolas Cage, Ron Perlman, Stephen Campbell Moore, Claire Foy

Director: Dominic Sena

Synopsis from IMDB: 14th-century knights transport a suspected witch to a monastery, where monks deduce her powers could be the source of the Black Plague.

Trailer:

Chris’ Take: Maybe I spoke too soon about hope for the new year. What a depressing way to start off: a new Nicolas Cage film. I don’t know what to make of this premise, and just looking at Cage’s face on screen almost induces vomit. Please, please do not go see this. I don’t want to give anymore money or validity to his sham of a career. If you want to hear more about the Keep Nic off the Screen (KNOTS) Foundation, read this article: https://chrispetersen25.wordpress.com/2010/06/21/5-actors-i-cant-believe-keep-getting-work-1/

Limited Releases

The Time That Remains (Le Temps qu’il Reste)

Rated: Unrated

Starring: Saleh Bakri, Yasmine Haj, Leila Muammar, Elia Suleiman

Director: Elia Suleiman

Synopsis from IMDB: An examination of the creation of the state of Israel in 1948 through to the present day.

Trailer:

Chris’ Take: I wouldn’t have guessed the synopsis based on the trailer. The early reviews were good and it won a couple of French awards, so it might be checking out on Netflix, but maybe not the theater.

10 Great Films Almost Ruined by Poor Casting

13 Oct
Chris: We all know these kinds of films. You will be watching and thoroughly enjoying a great film when BAM! Like a drunken uncle stumbling through a family reunion scaring the kids, an unwanted face will appear on the screen that just has no place in the film. Maybe it is a music star trying to make a breakthrough in films, maybe it is an animated annoyance, but whatever it is you immediately start singing the song, “One of these things is not like the others…” until it completely distracts you from the movie. Pac and I are going to regale you with some of the greatest casting missteps. Let’s get it started with one of mine…

#10 Kevin Costner in The Untouchables

What a great film. There are so many classic lines and moments of passion and rage played out by the likes of Sean Connery and Robert DeNiro. It has a great script and a great director, what could possibly go….wait…who is that cardboard cut out in a trench coat and fedora delivering his lines with the conviction of professor who has given the same lecture on organic chemistry 500 times? It is none other than Kevin Costner, trying to drain the energy from Connery in every scene.

 

 

I'm pretty sure his face stayed like this the whole movie.

 

He is like that guy in an improv group that no one wants to do a scene with because he blocks them at every turn. It took all of Connery, DeNiro, and Andy Garcia’s effort to salvage that movie and they did a great job.

 

 

Now look here, son. When they call 'Action!' You have to do something. I don't care what it is, but please for the love of God do something.

 

Costner did not do nearly enough justice to such a great ending line as, “I believe I’ll have a drink” and I can just hear Brian DePalma explaining to his friends, “We did 97 takes and that was the best one.” There are so many other actors who could have played that better. I mean Kevin Bacon was in everything in the 80’s. Why couldn’t they get him?

Pac: Sure Chris, if you had to pick a weak link in the Untouchables It’d definitely be Costner, but The Untouchables is still a great movie, certainly in my top 25, so I can’t say that he ruined it too much, for me at least.  Besides, Costner made great baseball movies like Field of Dreams and Bull Durham so don’t rag on him too much. Not to mention he had two very good performances in a row in 2006/2007, first with The Guardian followed up by Mr. Brooks.

#9 Dane Cook in Mr. Brooks

Too bad Mr. Brooks was almost ruined by Dane Cook.

Dane Cook is only an average comedian and his comedic performances aren’t even very good.  Sure he was funny in Waiting but name me another movie you liked with Dane Cook.  Mr. Brooks is a very good psychological thriller and otherwise well cast.  Hell, the tension between Mr. Brooks (Costner) and his imaginary counterpart Marshall (William Hurt) really carried the movie and the kill scenes were chilling, this movie could have been great.  This is a prime example of poor casting, this role should not have gone to a comedic actor.  You can’t really blame the director though,  he probably didn’t realize Dane Cook was a comedian.

 

 

"Was that a joke? No seriously, I wouldn't know a joke if I heard one. Was that a joke?"

 

Chris: I have no argument with that. But, what I do have an argument with is….

#8 Katie Holmes in Batman Begins

I really wonder how much Tom Cruise paid the casting crew for this genius move?

 

 

Christian Science went uncredited for a hefty portion of the production cost.

 

While, in my opinion, this was one of the most pointless uses of a love story in a superhero movie , couldn’t they have picked someone who at least could have brought some more depth to the role? What I do have to give Christopher Nolan and crew credit for (outside of having one of the greatest filmographies right now) is the fact that they got rid of her for the second film. Since, in the first film her character doesn’t really have a point other than to hold Batman back, you would think she would try to make herself known by bringing a little bit of screen presence to the table, but it almost seemed like every time she came on the screen it’s like she wasn’t there anyway because she was so dull and lifeless.

 

 

Christian Bale moving Katie Holmes off the set to continue with the scene.

 

You know what she would have been a good pick for? The Invisible Woman in Fantastic Four because then at least she would have an excuse for not having screen presence.

Pac: Katie Holmes was terrible, you have to give a lot of credit to the Nolans for replacing her with Gyllenhaal mid-franchise.  You can’t say that her character was pointless though; Rachel Dawes was a catalyst for a lot of the plot in the 2nd movie, and her death is important to Bruce Wayne’s character development.  You know what character was pointless…

#7 Chris Tucker in The 5th Element

There is a reason this movie has become a cult classic.  It is much smarter than the campy science fiction film it first appears to be (it is strongly rooted in theology), the cinematography and effects earned it an Oscar nomination, and it is very well cast.  Bruce Willis and Milla Jovovich had great chemistry, and Gary Oldman is one of the best actors in Hollywood; unfortunately all of that almost came undone with Chris Tucker as Ruby Rhod.  I’m not sure whether to blame Tucker for his over-the-top and often annoying portrayal as a flamboyant DJ escorting Korben Dallas on the planet Fhloston Paradise or blame Luc Besson for writing this character in the first place but I would have rather Katie Holmes played Ruby Rhod because I would have been able to ignore her.

Also, I’m still unsure whether the character was supposed to be a man, woman, or some sort of alien.  Decide for yourself, if you can endure it…

Chris: My vote is for a mix of all three. With that pleasant thought I will continue on with….

#6 Emile Hirsch in The Girl Next Door

When Pac and I were first coming up with the idea for this list I tossed this one out there as an afterthought and never thought I would actually keep this one on the list. The more I thought about it, the more I realized that Hirsch deserves it for playing this character so blandly. The only time he shows any charisma is when he is on ecstasy at the award reception. It is one thing to be shown up by one or two supporting characters, but he gets shown up by every single one of them. I mean, Timothy Olyphant was perfect as Kelly, Elisha Cuthbert was not only va-va vooom sexy, but she played her part extremely well. Then, there was Paul Dano who brought some depth to what could have been a stock character and Chris Marquette played a great motor mouth. Why couldn’t Hirsch feed off of the energy? If it wasn’t for these people around him, the movie would have failed. His role was important and could have been more sympathetic, but instead he plays it boring and I wished Elisha Cuthbert had ended up with Klitz or Eli or someone who at least deserved it.

 

 

The expression on Cuthbert's face seems to echo my sentiments.

 

I am pretty sure that Olyphant was like, “Can I really beat him in the car scene? Please?” Maybe he did and the director just let it go. I wouldn’t blame him.

Pac: That’s twice now you’ve included the main character/protagonist of a film on this list, I feel compelled to do the same and I know you’ll support this choice.

#5 Nicolas Cage in Con Air

It was hard for me to put this performance on this list, not because I like Nicolas Cage, but because I couldn’t decide which of his movies to include on this list.  If I ever need a Hollywood agent I will most definitely hire Cage’s agent.  How he was able to successfully sell this man as an action hero is a mystery to me.  The Rock and Con Air should have been enough to end that phenomenon but somehow Cage got the following resume:

  • Face/Off
  • Gone in Sixty Seconds
  • National Treasure
  • Ghost Rider
  • Next
  • Bangkok Dangerous
  • Kick-Ass
  • Drive Angry 3D

Seriously!?!  In what world does Nicolas Cage get to be an action star? Why don’t we just make that dorky kid from Disney’s Even Stevens an action hero while we’re at it…

 

...Life is unfair sometimes

 

But back to Con Air.  With an ensemble cast including: John Cusack, John Malkovich, Ving Rhames, Steve Buscemi, Danny Trejo, and Dave Chappelle, how did they miss the mark so terribly with Nicolas Cage?  My thoughts are that Jerry Bruckheimer intended to have someone else star in this film (Bruce Willis?) and either couldn’t secure him or was convinced that Nicolas Cage would be a good alternative.  The acting was one dimensional, the accent was terrible, and the fact that Nicolas Cage was capable of kicking ass was a joke.

 

Not to mention the hair

 

Chris: I’ll tell you what happened. Cage whined to his Uncle Francis, one of the greatest directors of all time (if you exclude Jack). You know who else is a great director? Martin Scorcese. He is one of the best eyes for talent too, but there is one thing I have to take up with him. Why the heck did you pick….

#4 Cameron Diaz in Gangs of New York

If there is one  thing about that film that bugs me, it is her. I think she got her Irish accent from watching a Lucky Charms commercial, but then the thing about it is that it comes and goes whenever she feels like it. I’m sure Scorcese had so many other options for women to play that role, but for some reason he picked Diaz. I keep running the repeated Arrested Development line about George Michael’s girlfriend, Ann, right now.

 

Her?

 

She has almost no dramatic capability whatsoever. Every time she says something dramatic, I just end up laughing to myself and I lose the ruse of the great movie for a split second. I like how Leo DiCaprio never looks interested in her either, but sucks it up because he is working with Scorcese or something. Fortunately, she isn’t in the film that long, but had just a big enough role to bother me. I kept praying that one of those knives from Daniel Day Lewis would miss just slightly and remove her character from the film entirely.

 

 

So close...whoa, she really looks determined to ruin this film.

 

Pac: I’m Irish and from New York so I felt personally insulted by that performance; and to make matters worse, they costumed her as a ginger.  At least Scorcese didn’t miscast two roles in that movie like Michael Bay did with…

#3 Ben Affleck & Liv Tyler in Armageddon

I mentioned in my Top 10 Horror Movies of All Time how much I dislike Liv Tyler as an actress, so it’s no surprise I didn’t enjoy her in this movie.  I don’t like Liv Tyler in any movie she is in, but why ruin a great action movie with a love story subplot involving her and Ben Affleck?  A lot of notoriety has been given to Ben Affleck recently for resurrecting his career with movies like The Town, but in order to resurrect your career you need to kill it first.  Affleck did that in three easy steps:

 

  1. Armageddon
  2. Daredevil
3. Jennifer Lopez

The love story between Ben Affleck’s character A.J. and Liv Tyler’s character Grace Stamper (daughter of Bruce Willis’s character Harry) took up way too much screen time in this movie, had little to no chemistry, and was entirely soundtracked by Aerosmith.  Additionally, both characters were given too much screen time apart from each other, especially Liv Tyler who’s climactic scene in the control room is unemotional and boring.  Not to mention they ripped of a much better scene from Days of Thunder and substituted “Sweet & Low” for an animal cracker.

 

 

Ben: "This scene was much sexier with Nicole Kidman." Liv: "Baby you have such sweet pillow talk."

 

Now only if Michael Bay could resurrect his career…
Chris: If Michael Bay never makes another film, I could die a happy man. I hope he never even attempts to resurrect his career and he just stays buried beneath the pile of money and crap that came out of the Transformers series.
For my final entry in this article…
#2 Julia Roberts in Ocean’s Eleven
The Ocean’s movies tried to resurrect the coolness of the Rat Pack. The combination of George Clooney and Brad Pitt was meant to mimic the duo of Frank Sinatra and Dean Martin. So a group of cool guys deserves a cool chick to fill out the movie, right? When you think cool chick did you ever think it would be Julia Roberts? I sure as heck didn’t. She is a downer on the whole movie. She is like that girlfriend that keeps your best friend away and whenever she hangs out with the group complains loudly the whole time.

 

It looks like that part in Anchorman where everyone looks away when Julia Roberts looks at the camera.

 

 

George Clooney never looks excited to see her when they are on screen. He looks like he would rather be hanging out with the cool kids, but is contractually obligated to spend time with her, like a business partner…or a male escort.

 

I told you not to look at me while we negotiate price.

 

 

They could have found so many other women to play a cool chick trying to move on from her past. The only reason they brought her on was to be a big name to match the clout of the other names on the docket. However, I would have settled for a lesser known actress to match the cool factor instead of the marquee name.
Unfortunately, they brought her around for a second time in the sequel and gave her a double role. The first film was at least salvaged by the great ensemble cast, but it wasn’t enough to counteract two Julia Roberts in the second film. Not even George Clooney, Brad Pitt, Matt Damon, Don Cheadle, Bernie Mac, Casey Affleck, Scott Caan, and Andy Garcia combined could do that.
Pac: That is true, she wasn’t involved in Ocean’s 13 and that film was much better than the …12.  Despite all the names we’ve discussed, there’s one actor that comes to mind though that ruins every good movie he is in.  I’m sure readers have been screaming his name in anticipation ever since number 10 and it’s no surprise that the #1 great film almost ruined by poor casting would be…
#1 Keanu Reeves in Dracula (and everything else in his filmography)
Poor Gary Oldman.  This is the 3rd film included on this list in which Gary Oldman has been involved (Batman Begins, The 5th Element). This is no coincidence, he is a great actor and rarely does he make a lackluster film but it’s disappointing he often gets stuck in films remembered more for their terrible performances by other stars.  Maybe this is why he’s never won an Oscar.  I have no doubt that he will some day though.
I’d like to thank my director for not casting Katie Holmes, Chris Tucker, or Keanu Reeves this time.

Dracula was Oscar bait for Oldman.  He had the titular role in a classic noir film with a lot of history of critical success.  Anthony Hopkins had a supporting role and was fresh off winning an oscar for playing Hannibal Lector, not to mention that the film was directed by Francis Ford Coppola (The Godfather Trilogy).  Since this movie’s release Coppola has criticized his decision for casting Reeves in the film, claiming that he wanted a young, hot star to draw the female demographic.  Brad Pitt or Tom Cruise were both young hot stars at the time (though Pitt hadn’t really made a name for himself yet) and they did make a pretty good vampire movie themselves just two years later, but hindsight is 20/20.

And what about everything else?  Here’s a list of other movies Reeves almost ruined in chronological order:

  • Much Ado About Nothing (1993)
  • Speed (1994)
  • Chain Reaction (1996)
  • The Devil’s Advocate (1997)
  • The Matrix (1999) I’ll admit though this role was perfect for him
  • The Watcher (2000) He actually did ruin this movie
  • Hard Ball (2001)
  • Constantine (2005)
  • Street Kings (2008)
  • and I’m sure there are others that I haven’t seen as well

 

Whoa! Harsh Bro.

 

This list is probably very incomplete. So what are some of your least favorite casting decisions? Leave them in the comments!