Archive | February, 2011

Full List of Razzie Winners (or Losers)

28 Feb

The Academy Awards were not the only movie awards to take place over the weekend.  Now in its 31st year, the Razzies award pictures and performers with their infamous award for the worst of the year.  This years Razzies took place on February 26, the day before the Oscars (per usual) and featured some pretty violent offenders.  However, the night really only belonged to two films; The Last Airbender and Sex and the City 2  took home the bulk of the awards and rightfully so.  On a weekend that is dedicated to the film industry’s self recognition, the Razzies provide a much-needed check to the industry.  Additionally, this infamous award program created two categories that deserved special recognition in 2010 and hopefully help put an end to these growing trends.

Worst Prequel, Remake, Rip-Off or Sequel (Combined Category for 2010) Winner 2010:

Sex and the City 2

Worst Screenplay Winner 2010:

The Last Airbender

Worst Director Winner 2010:

M. Night Shyamalan

Worst Screen Couple /Worst Screen Ensemble Winner 2010:

The entire cast of Sex and the City 2

Worst Eye-Gouging Mis-Use of 3-D (Special Category for 2010!) Winner 2010:

The Last Airbender (Released in “Fake 3-D)

Worst Supporting Actress Winner 2010:

Jessica Alba (The Killer Inside Me, Little Fockers, Machete, and Valentine’s Day)

Worst Supporting Actor Winner 2010:

Jackson Rathbone (The Last Airbender, Twilight Saga: Eclipse)

Worst Actress Winner 2010:

The Four “Gal Pals”: Sarah Jessica Parker, Kim Cattrall, Kristin Davis, and Cynthia Nixon (Sex and the City 2)

Worst Actor Winner 2010:

Ashton Kutcher (Valentine’s Day, Killers)

Worst Picture Winner 2010:

The Last Airbender

TAKE TWO: Hall Pass (2011)

28 Feb

Hall Pass

Rated: R

Starring: Owen Wilson, Jason Sudeikis, Christina Applegate, Jenna Fischer

Director: The Farrelly Brothers

Chris’ Take: The Farrelly Brothers hadn’t released a full length comedy film in three years, but I hadn’t missed them. While Dumb and Dumber will probably always be one of my favorite comedies, and There’s Something About Mary is always good for stopping on the FX channel for ten minutes before moving on, they seemed to be making a whole bunch of movies centered around a few brief laughs involving a comedic gimmick. This film was no different.

When a married man, Rick (Owen Wilson), falls into marital woes, his wife (Jenna Fischer) decides that it might be best to give him a “Hall Pass”, which means a week off from marriage. For that week, Rick is free to relive his bachelor days and attempt to bed women to his heart’s content. His pal, Fred  (Jason Sudeikis), convinces his wife to let him join Rick on his marital misadventures, but the two soon find out that they aren’t the pick up artists they imagined themselves in their minds.

The premise for the film had a lot of potential. Two married guys get in over their heads hitting on younger women. Mix in some sight gags, and a dash of the always great Richard Jenkins, and you have the makings for an entertaining comedy. However, the Farrelly Brothers decided that it would be great to set up the premise for the first forty minutes of the film with some quick laughs, but then when the meat of the film arrives, the plot seems to come to a dead halt. There is a solid thirty minutes in the movie where nothing happens besides watching a bunch of guys hang out and repeat some of the laughs of better comedies. Plus, while it would be a challenge to see how the marriages could get to the point of requiring a “Hall Pass”, they certainly didn’t do nearly a good enough job of making that decision make sense, it just kind of happened.

One of the problems for me is that Owen Wilson and Jason Sudeikis are decent on their own, or when paired with Richard Jenkins (who could mess that up?), but together they lacked comedic chemistry. A lot of the lines that were funny, seemed rushed or ill-timed, and I think a lot of that had to do with the instincts of one playing off of the other.

I think these guys really miss each other.

Another issue is that the film not only struggles with its pace, but with making the character development seem natural. The characters seemed to just be transported from scene to scene, but their reactions were inconsistent and didn’t make sense. One minute they are doing something completely and shamelessly debased, but then a split second later are a saint and devoted husband. There was no transition period or logical progression for these characters, which completely detached me from them because I couldn’t really figure out who they were.

Finally, when they actually get around to doing something with their time off, it kind of sputters by trying to wrap up a lot of mildly humorous plot threads in a short period of time. In reality, the Farrelly Brothers could’ve cut out the middle forty minutes and ended up with a more cohesive project that would be great for an HBO special or something.

At this point, The Farrelly Brothers reign in comedy has been over for about a decade now. The torch has been passed to a new generation of comedians, and while they were once great, there is very little spark in their humor now and they just end up doing a greatest hit tribute to other comedies.

The elevator music type of greatest hits, not actual covers.

  • Characters: C-
  • Directing: D+
  • Plot: C+
  • Humor: C
  • Performances: C
  • OVERALL: C-

Pac’s Take:  I left our screening of Hall Pass a lot more satisfied than Chris did and was expecting there to be a lot of disparity between our two reviews.  One of the benefits of Chris writing the first part of these reviews is that I get to read his thoughts before I write my own (and I don’t have to do a film description).  However, after reading Chris’s take on Hall Pass there is a lot of points that I can agree with.  The pacing was a bit off as it took a while for the film to get to the “hall pass” portion of the movie, and the chemistry between the two leads was not spectacular.  However, the humor of this film was spread out enough to keep me interested for the entire film and I found myself laughing throughout.  It was when Owen Wilson or Jason Sudeikis had the screen to themselves that I laughed most (or with Richard Jenkins), but that was a lot of the time.

Another point Chris mentioned that was the build up to the two leads actually receiving the hall pass.  While the actions of these men (especially Owen Wilson’s character) didn’t necessarily warrant such an extreme “punishment”, they couldn’t do anything too extreme or that would have made the (very predictable) ending extremely unbelievable.   My biggest gripe was with the supporting cast and their role in the plot of this film.  While Richard Jenkins is always entertaining, all of Rick and Fred’s other friends were boring stock characters who provided little to no contribution to the film.  Furthermore, continuing to jump back to Jenna Fischer and Christina Applegate’s break from their husbands was completely boring and unnecessary.  Their sole purpose in this film was to appeal to the female demographic, providing a wider range of film goers who may pay for admission.

I didn’t have high expectations going into this film, and that may be why I enjoyed it as much as I did.  The film provided everything you’d expect from a Farrelly Brother’s R-rated comedy, mostly crude and raunchy humor.  I would consider this the 4th best film these two have made together, behind Me, Myself, and Irene, Dumb and Dumber, and There’s Something about Mary.  Your money is best spent waiting for the DVD/Blu Ray rental, but if you’re in the mood for a movie about getting a vacation from marriage, this is definitely your best bet.

Unless you need help falling asleep

 Here are my grades:

  • Characters: C
  • Directing: B-
  • Plot: B-
  • Humor: B
  • Performances: B-
  • OVERALL: B-

TAKE TWO: The 2011 Academy Awards

28 Feb

Chris’ Take: I remember when I first started this blog in June of last year how disheartened I was by the outlook of the cinema in 2010. All I really had to seriously look forward to last summer was Inception, and at that point I was only slowly beginning to hear the murmurings of The Social Network and Black Swan. But even then, how excited could I be when all I had to go on was “a movie about Facebook” and a “psycho-horror ballet thriller”? With the bleak outlook of 2011, last night’s Oscars made me nostalgic for 2010,  because it truly ended up being a great year for film.

For the most part, everything was about what I expected. With all the buzz about The King’s Speech going into last night, I was almost positive it would take away the most coveted prize, and it certainly deserved recognition. I would have been content if The Social Network or Black Swan won as well because they were both superb films, but for different reasons.

What does surprise me about last night was that Tom Hooper took home the Best Director award for The King’s Speech. While the film really tells a great story and the script is spectacular, the direction seemed fairly straightforward. Hooper had a top-notch cast to work with as well, which I’m sure made his job even easier. In terms of direction, I think someone like Darren Aronofsky for Black Swan should have won. His combination of so many different technical aspects of film, especially sound and color (or lack thereof) and the frenzied pace of the film, were all crafted under his genius and certainly worthy of recognition. I am sure everyone has their opinion about this, you could make an argument for everyone on that list, but I was a little disappointed with the Academy for that one, making it seem like a package deal with the Best Picture winner. 

Where were you on this one Academy?

I was glad to see that Inception received some accolades as well, even if it was in the technical department (Best Cinematography, Visual Effects, Sound Mixing and Sound Editing). It lacked the emotional punch of a Best Picture winner, but it certainly was one of the most visually striking films of the year, and really was a labor of love for Nolan and crew.

As for the acting awards, I think each of them went to the right person in each category. I have no complaints there and I am happy that “Christian Bale‘s Reckless Weight Loss Guide to Winning an Academy Award” finally paid off. Melissa Leo certainly was almost speechless that she won, except for the f-bomb she managed to drop before getting off the stage.

I heard that she studied with this guy.

Then we move on to some of the second tier awards. There was never a contest for Best Animated Feature, Toy Story 3 was going to win and that’s that. Best Original Score ended up in the right hands. Trent Reznor’s soundtrack really set a pensive tone to The Social Network and really made it a three-dimensional film.

The good kind. Not the kind you have to shell out extra money to have your eyes abused.

 As far as I know, the other awards (i.e. costume design and art direction) went to the right people. I am not well versed enough in those categories to argue one way or the other. The only thing that makes me sad is that The Wolfman gets to add “Academy Award Winner” to its new DVD cover.

In big letters: ACADEMY AWARD WINNER!!! In small letters: for something everyone forgets is a category.

Again, congrats to all the winners. It’s been a great year and hopefully I will be as pleasantly surprised this time next year when we report on them again.

Pac’s Take:  The Academy Awards this year, more so than others, was one of the more enjoyable watches.  Possibly because I made a substantially greater effort to see many of the nominated films, maybe because the hots (James Franco and Anne Hathaway) are two performers that I enjoy and have a lot of charisma, or maybe because the Academy Awards are becoming more about my generation.  The only disappointment – the lack of surprise in almost every category.  Again this may be due to my knowledge of the films but as The King’s Speech continued to pick up awards throughout the night I could tell it was going to win Best Picture, a sentiment that made the night anti-climatic (even though the film deserved the award).

One thing that kept getting mentioned during the awards that it was a pleasure just to be nominated for an award, and I think in a year like 2010 this couldn’t be more true.  This was certainly the case, as pointed out by Steven Spielberg, for the Best Picture category when snubs like Raging Bull were recognized.  In years past they recognize a lot of those snubs by awarding them Oscars for current works that may not be as good as their previous efforts, this year that didn’t seem to be the case. 

Point (Break) in case...

 Okay, so maybe The Departed was a better example, but consider the Best Director winner – Tom Hooper.  Chris mentioned Darren Aronofsky for this award but I was certain that David Fincher would go home victorious.  No disrespect to Hooper, his film was great and deserved the accolades it received but the track record of the Academy at least the past decade has been to go with a name, and Tom isn’t even the most famous director with the signature T. Hooper (though now he’s the most awarded).

Take my name, fine I'll take your face

I made my guesses when the nominees were announced and I wanted to compare those guesses to last night’s results so I’ll leave you with that.  Also, for good measure and the spirit of competition I’ve included Chris’s guesses as well.  Here’s to 2011 hopefully being as pleasant a surprise as 2010.

 

Award Winner Chris’s Guess Pac’s Guess
Best Supporting Actor Christian Bale Christian Bale Christian Bale
Best Supporting Actress Melissa Leo Jacki Weaver Amy Adams
Best Original Screenplay David Seller (The King’s Speech ) David Seller David Seller
Best Adapted Screenplay Aaron Sorkin (The Social Network) Aaron Sorkin Debra Granik & Anne Rosellini
Best Foreign Film In a Better World Biutiful In a Better World
Best Animated Film Toy Story 3 Toy Story 3 Toy Story 3
Best Actor Colin Firth Colin Firth Colin Firth
Best Actress Natalie Portman Natalie Portman Natalie Portman
Best Director Tom Hooper Darren Aronofsky David Fincher
Best Picture The King’s Speech The King’s Speech The King’s Speech

Opening This Week (28 Feb – 06 Mar, 2011)

28 Feb

This past weekend proved quite a success for K.N.O.T.S., Nic Cage’s $50 million dollar exploitation film (on more than one level) raked in a measly $5.3 million, which is less than Season of the Witch, again proving that Cage may not be as bankable as some predict. The weekend was topped by Gnomeo and Juliet ($14.2M), continuing a nice little run during the weak February film season. The Farrelly Brothers’ new comedy, Hall Pass (13.4M) came in second, with Unknown ($12.4M) coming in third.

Here’s what we got coming out this week:

The Adjustment Bureau

Rated: PG-13

Starring: Matt Damon, Emily Blunt, John Slattery, Terrence Stamp

Director: George Nolfi

Synopsis from IMDB: The affair between a politician and a ballerina is affected by mysterious forces keeping the lovers apart.

Trailer:

Chris’ Take: While the film looks exciting, my guess is that it will be merely entertaining without providing anything new to the thriller/conspiracy genre. It is based on a Philip K. Dick novel, which could bode well for its structure, and his stories have a pretty high success rate.

Well....for the most part.

Plus, the cast is pretty solid, so it has a lot of things going for it. Early in the week, it has a 67% on RottenTomatoes, which will probably change throughout the course of the week, but the question is which way will it go?

Rango

Rated: PG

Starring: Johnny Depp, Abigail Breslin, Isla Fisher, Alfred Molina

Director: Gore Verbinski

Synopsis from IMDB: A chameleon that aspires to be a swashbuckling hero finds himself in a Western town plagued by bandits and is forced to literally play the role in order to protect it.

Trailer:

Chris’ Take: While the production of the film looks interesting, the plot does not. In fact, the main character sounds downright irritating and his face looks like it was taken from the movie poster for Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas. I don’t expect much out of this one, but I’m sure it was a lot of fun to make.

Beastly

Rated: PG-13

Starring: Alex Pettyfer, Vanessa Hudgens, Neil Patrick Harris, Mary-Kate Olsen

Director: Daniel Barnz

Synopsis from IMDB: A modern-day take on the “Beauty and the Beast” tale where a New York teen is transformed into a hideous monster in order to find true love.

Trailer:

Chris’ Take: Well, I guess the Twilight crowd needed something to tide them over until Red Riding Hood, another adaptation of a fairy tale. I am still not sure whether I would want to see this emo version of Beauty and the Beast, or Beautician and the Beast.

 Take Me Home Tonight

Rated: R

Starring: Topher Grace, Dan Fogler, Anna Faris, Teresa Palmer

Director: Michael Dowse

Synopsis from IMDB: Follow an aimless college grad who pursues his dream girl at a wild Labor Day weekend party. He, his twin sister and their best friend struggle with their burgeoning adulthood over the course of the night.

Trailer:

Chris’ Take: This looks like a run-of-the-mill comedy, but there is something endearing about it to me. I don’t think it will be anything spectacular, especially with Dan Fogler as one of the stars, but maybe it is the 80’s soundtrack bringing back memories of The Wedding Singer that attracts me to this film.

Limited Releases

I Saw the Devil

Rated: Unrated

Starring: Byung-hun Lee, Min-sik Choi, Ho-jin Jeon

Director: Ji-woon Kim

Synopsis from IMDB: A secret agent tracks a serial killer who murdered his fiancée.

Trailer:

Chris’ Take: While this does look pretty badass, it doesn’t look like anything we haven’t seen in every other revenge flick. Still, it looks like it could be the best action film released in the U.S. so far this year.

Bereavement

Rated: R

Starring: Michael Biehn, Alexandra Dadarrio, John Savage

Director: Stevan Mena

Synopsis from IMDB: The horrific account of 6 year old Martin Bristol, abducted from his backyard swing and forced to witness the brutal crimes of a deranged madman.

Trailer:

Chris’ Take: The premise for this film is pretty disturbing and it looks like it is in the torture porn genre, but it is hard to tell. I would be interested in seeing this for the exploration of the psychological trauma this 6 year old kid would suffer in his later years. The film has a 7.5 on IMDB, but the RottenTomatoes reviews are mediocre. Probably a Netflix rental, but there is no rush.

Full List of Academy Award Winners

28 Feb

Well the 83rd Annual Academy Awards are in the books and most of them went down as predicted, with The King’s Speech reigning supreme. Pac and I will have our full critique out later, but here is the full ist of Academy Award winners in case you missed the action last night. Congrats to everyone, after a rough start, 2010 really was a great year for film.

Best picture

  • “Black Swan”
  • “The Fighter”
  • “Inception”
  • “The Kids Are All Right”
  • “The King’s Speech” – WINNER
  • “127 Hours”
  • “The Social Network”
  • “Toy Story 3”
  • “True Grit”
  • “Winter’s Bone”

Best actor

  • Javier Bardem, “Biutiful”
  • Jeff Bridges, “True Grit”
  • Jesse Eisenberg, “The Social Network”
  • Colin Firth, “The King’s Speech” – WINNER
  • James Franco, “127 Hours”

Best actress

  • Annette Bening, “The Kids Are All Right”
  • Nicole Kidman, “Rabbit Hole”
  • Jennifer Lawrence, “Winter’s Bone”
  • Natalie Portman, “Black Swan” –WINNER
  • Michelle Williams, “Blue Valentine”

Supporting actor

  • Christian Bale, “The Fighter” – WINNER
  • John Hawkes, “Winter’s Bone”
  • Jeremy Renner, “The Town”
  • Mark Ruffalo, “The Kids Are All Right”
  • Geoffrey Rush, “The King’s Speech”

Supporting actress

  • Amy Adams, “The Fighter”
  • Helena Bonham Carter, “The King’s Speech”
  • Melissa Leo, “The Fighter” – WINNER
  • Hailee Steinfeld, “True Grit”
  • Jacki Weaver, “Animal Kingdom”

Director

  • Darren Aronofsky, “Black Swan”
  • David O. Russell, “The Fighter”
  • Tom Hooper, “The King’s Speech” – WINNER
  • David Fincher, “The Social Network”
  • Joel Coen and Ethan Coen, “True Grit”

Animated feature

  • “How to Train Your Dragon”
  • “The Illusionist”
  • “Toy Story 3” – WINNER

Foreign language film

  • “Biutiful”
  • “Dogtooth”
  • “In a Better world” – WINNER
  • “Incendies”
  • “Outside the Law”

Documentary feature

  • “Exit Through the Gift Shop”
  • “Gasland”
  • “Inside Job” – WINNER
  • “Restrepo”
  • “Waste Land”

Documentary short

  • “Killing in the Name”
  • “Poster Girl”
  • “Strangers No More” – WINNER
  • “Sun Come Up”
  • “The Warriors of Qiugang”

Adapted screenplay

  • “127 Hours”
  • “The Social Network” – WINNER
  • “Toy Story 3”
  • “True Grit”
  • “Winter’s Bone”

Original screenplay

  • “Another Year”
  • “The Fighter”
  • “Inception”
  • “The Kids Are All Right”
  • “The King’s Speech” – WINNER

Art direction

  • “Alice in Wonderland” – WINNER
  • “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part I”
  • “Inception”
  • “The King’s Speech”
  • “True Grit”

Cinematography

  • “Black Swan”
  • “Inception”WINNER
  • “The King’s Speech”
  • “The Social Network”
  • “True Grit”

Costume design

  • “Alice in Wonderland” – WINNER
  • “I Am Love”
  • “The King’s Speech”
  • “The Tempest”
  • “True Grit”

Makeup

  • “Barney’s Version”
  • “The Way Back”
  • “The Wolfman” – WINNER

Film editing

  • “Black Swan”
  • “The Fighter”
  • “The King’s Speech”
  • “127 Hours”
  • “The Social Network” – WINNER

Visual effects

  • “Alice in Wonderland”
  • “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1”
  • “Hereafter”
  • “Inception” – WINNER
  • “Iron Man 2”

Original score

  • “How to Train Your Dragon”
  • “Inception”
  • “The King’s Speech”
  • “127 Hours”
  • “The Social Network” – WINNER

Original song

  • “Coming Home” from “Country Strong”
  • “I See the Light” from “Tangled”
  • “If I Rise” from “127 Hours”
  • “We Belong Together” from “Toy Story 3″ – WINNER

Sound editing

  • “Inception” – WINNER
  • “Toy Story 3”
  • “Tron: Legacy”
  • “True Grit”
  • “Unstoppable”

Sound mixing

  • “Inception” – WINNER
  • “The King’s Speech”
  • “Salt”
  • “The Social Network”
  • “True Grit”

Animated short film

  • “Day & Night”
  • “The Gruffalo”
  • “Let’s Pollute”
  • “The Lost Thing” – WINNER
  • “Madagascar, carnet de voyage” (“Madagascar, a Journey Diary”)

Live action short film

  • “The Confession”
  • “The Crush”
  • “God of Love” – WINNER
  • “Na Wewe”
  • “Wish 143”

Remake Rundown: The New Bourne, The Bodyguard, and The Loft

25 Feb

It is no surprise that it is a busy time for remakes and sequels. 2011 is setting the record for having the most sequels in a year, beating out 2003 pretty handily. It looks like there will be no signs of slowing in the near future either. Here is some of the news that has come out in the last week:

The Bourne Legacy Casting Call

Last Fall, the tragic announcement was made that instead of leaving the Bourne franchise alone, ending on what was by far the best film in the series, the franchise would continue without Matt Damon or Paul Greengrass. Instead of making a direct sequel, Tony Gilroy, the writer for the first three films, is making a fourth film that will be a spinoff of the classic amnesia and adrenaline fueled spy thriller. The film won’t feature the Jason Bourne character, but instead bank on the recognizable name in the title while focusing on a new character with a similar background. According to Variety, the new character will somehow pave the way for the actual Jason Bourne to return for a fifth installment of the series as well.

Now, the casting call begins. Some names mentioned in Variety include Jake Gyllenhall, Tobey Maguire and Garrett Hedlund. On top of that, Deadline is reporting some other names as well, such as Paul Dano, Alex Pettyfer, Taylor Kitsch, Michael Fassbender, Oscar Isaac and Luke Evans.

Out of all those names, I think I like Michael Fassbender for the role. I have no idea how Paul Dano would fit in there. While I like him as an actor, the only way I could see him working in is if they wanted a less physical Bourne. I don’t think I would like having someone that equals the star power of Matt Damon, such as Maguire or Gyllenhall. I think the best route for Gilroy to take is to use a lesser known actor and really focus on inventing someone that is completely different. I think if they try to repeat the same formula as the Damon Bourne, it won’t live up to the high expectations.

The Unnecessary Remake: The Bodyguard

I don’t have much to say about this one, but  according to Deadline , The Bodyguard, the 1992 film that combined the great singing talents of Whitney Houston and the mediocre acting talents of Kevin Costner into a box office hit, is getting an unrequested update. Maybe I hang out in the wrong circles, but I never really heard someone saying, “Man, I really wish they would update The Bodyguard.

I still have yet to hear anyone say they liked "The Bodyguard"

The update will be written by Jeremiah Friedman, whose work has primarily been with film shorts, but was placed on the 2010 Hollywood Black List, a list of the best unproduced scripts, for his Family Getaway screenplay. The concept for the film will essentially be the same, but with a technological twist. Back in the early 90’s Whitney Houston had to only deal with stalkers via following and phone harrassment. Now, bring in the cruel world of cyber bullying and there is a whole new dimension for Hollywood to make a quick buck.

James Marsden and Patrick Wilson to Star in Remake of The Loft

One of Hollywood’s new tricks is to take recently released foreign films and update them for the American audience by taking away all that work it takes to read subtitles.

There are so many words. So much work!

The most recent attempts at this were Death at a Funeral and Let Me In released last year, and The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo comes out this Winter. Some of these have been successful and it is nice to be made aware of some great foreign films that I might not have heard of otherwise.

The newest addition to this list will be the 2008 Belgian filmThe Loft, which is about five married men who go in together on a loft where they can bring  their mistresses for sexual misadventures. While this sounds comedic, it turns sour when one of their mistresses winds up dead in their hideout of infidelity. Each person begins to suspect the other and their lives begin to unravel. James Marsden and Patrick Wilson are set to star in this bizarre thriller.

I think I will want to check out how the Belgian film turned out before I can really comment on this. But, based on the premise I think this could be intriguing, and James Marsden and Patrick Wilson are great for this type of film as well.

What are your thoughts on all this? Are these remakes/sequels going to be worth it?

Weekend Film Recommendation: This is England (2006)

25 Feb

This week’s film recommendation comes from across the pond. This is England, written and directed by Shane Meadows, and based on his experiences, won multiple awards, including a 2008 BAFTA for Best British Film. The film follows a bullied youth, Shaun (Thomas Turgoose), who is befriended by a group of multi-racial skinheads in early 1980’s Britain. Among them he finds a welcoming family, but when a more vocal skinhead, Combo (Stephen Graham), gets out of jail, the boiling undercurrent of racism in changing times threatens to overflow in the tight knit group, it leads to an intense and emotional conclusion.

The performances in the film are spectacular, at times both heartwarming and vicious. Stephen Graham, who is finally getting greater acknowledgement in the States with his role as Al Capone in the HBO Series Boardwalk Empire, plays the unbalanced Combo with grit and humor, and his performance never feels forced. Thomas Turgoose carries most of the weight of the film on his young shoulders and superbly juxtaposes the innocence of youth with the harsher adult themes. Danny Cohen, the director of photography combines several techniques to show this juxtaposition as well, and with all these elements combined make a powerfully pensive film.

Here is the trailer:

Have a great weekend!

Join K.N.O.T.S. (Keep Nic Off The Screen)!

24 Feb

by Chris Petersen

One of the first series I did on this blog listed the five actors that I can’t believe keep getting work, and at #1 was the bane of the cinema, Nicolas Cage, who has taken his recent efforts to ward off bankruptcy out on the average moviegoer. Instead of being subjected to one bad Nic Cage movie, we are subjected to three or four a year. Heck, it is February and we are already at 2!

All this is not to say that every once in a while, in blind squirrel-like fashion, he stumbles upon a decent film (Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans and Kick-Ass were good for him, and Drive Angry is actually at 62% on RottenTomatoes), but more than likely he is going to produce an absolute dud and, on his name alone, steal the money of people who have lived under a rock for the last 15 years.

And no, we're not talking about this rock.

I am saying that I have had enough. I can’t take it and I need your help to let Hollywood know that we will no longer be fooled by his name and his high school vagrant hair. I am starting the official society of K.N.O.T.S. (Keep Nic Off The Screen). A group dedicated to anti-Cage sentiment and the eventual removal of him from the big screen, particularly from action films.

I mean, who was the guy that looked at him and said, “This guy is a badass.”

Probably the same guy who thought this was a good idea.

He does alright when he plays an everyman, such as Adaptation or The Family Man, but he is just a disaster in action films, which is unfortunately what he does the most. I think the bad heavily outweighs the good with him, and rather than risk having our cinemas spoiled by his action film atrocities, I would just like to remove him from movies entirely.

Don’t think I am such a bad guy for leaving Nic Cage in the gutter when he is bankrupt.

He presumably already lives in a gutter.

I think he could be successful in many other fields. He seemed pretty convincing as a salesman in The Family Man. I could also see him in construction, or as a manager at McDonald’s.

But he is not quite Chick-Fil-A caliber.

If you want to be part of this movement, like this post at the top of the screen and place your comments in the area provided below.

**Trailer Time** Bad Teacher, Apollo 18, and a new Sucker Punch Trailer

23 Feb

Brian “Pac” Sostak

New trailers are the light towards a brighter future for this years crop of new releases.  With January and February so far being a disappointment, we can look forward to the spring and summer seasons chock full of new releases.  In this edition of “Trailer Time” we look at two films coming out this spring and one releasing this summer.

Bad Teacher: Releases June 24, 2011

Cameron Diaz has not been in a raunchy, vulgar comedy since 1998 when she was featured in both There’s Something About Mary and Very Bad Things.  Thirteen years later here she is dishing out the profanity in what appears to be a reincarnation of Billy Bob Thorton’s Bad Santa.  Since Diaz is not the box office draw she once was, the filmmakers were smart to put a strong supporting cast around her including Jason Segal, Lucy Punch, Justin Timberlake, and Phyllis Smith.  Diaz plays a potty-mouthed junior high teacher raising money to purchase breast implants to woo a new colleague (Timberlake).  This trailer is definitely NSFW due to the excessive language, so if you’re in the office grab your headphones.

Apollo 18: April 22, 2011

The “real footage” horror movie seems to be a popular trend for companies to make a quick buck.  Using unknown actors and “home footage” keeps the costs down and for now people are still finding the style compelling and suspenseful.  You’re likely to see 5 more Paranormal Activity films before that franchise runs out of steam but in the meantime feast your eyes on Apollo 18.  Created with a budget of only 5 million dollars, Apollo 18 takes a sci-fi/horror classic in Alien and blends it with Paranormal Activity.  I was pretty interested for the first 2/3 of this trailer when it looked more like Alien, but when it made the shift from creature feature to possessed crew member I began to lose interest.  With this film releasing only a week after one of my most anticipated films of the year, Scream 4, I may not want to see two horror films back-to-back and will may wait for Netflix to catch this one.

Sucker Punch: March 25, 2011

I’m beginning to become more excited about this movie’s release for a number of reasons, many having nothing to do with the actual film.  Being the earliest of these films to release, Sucker Punch marks the beginning of the spring/summer season that will hopefully have me looking forward to visiting the theater more frequently.  Additionally, Sucker Punch is the last look we’ll get at Zack Snyder’s portfolio before the release of the highly anticipated Superman: Man of Steel in December 2012.  On the fence about how good this movie will actually be, there is no doubt from the trailers that it will be visually stunning and a treat to watch in theaters.  The third trailer doesn’t show us much more than the previous (over played) trailer but does feature a little more action and special effects. 

Opening This Week (21 – 27 Feb, 2011)

22 Feb

The cinematic drolls of February continue this week with what looks like a bunch of weak releases, and one that reunites Nicolas Cage with his worst type of role…action hero. With those ominous words let’s see what else is on the docket:

Hall Pass

Rated: R

Starring: Owen Wilson, Jason Sudeikis, Jenna Fischer, Christina Appelgate

Director: The Farrelly Brothers

Synopsis from IMDB: A married man is granted the opportunity to have an affair by his wife. Joined in the fun by his best pal, things get a little out of control when both wives start engaging in extramarital activities as well.

Trailer:

Chris’ Take: While the Farrelly Brothers achieved great success with There’s Something About Mary and, to me, have a classic comedy with Dumb and Dumber, all of their other comedic efforts such as Shallow Hal, The Heartbreak Kid, Stuck On You and Fever Pitch were all mediocre at best. Seeing that their last good comedy was over ten years ago, I don’t have a whole lot of confidence in this one, even though I think that Jason Sudeikis is an underrated comedian.

Drive Angry 3D

Rated: R

Starring: Nicolas Cage, William Fichtner, Amber Heard, Billy Burke

Director: Patrick Lussier

Synopsis from IMDB: A vengeful father escapes from hell and chases after the men who killed his daughter and kidnapped his granddaughter.

Trailer:

Chris’ Take: Nicolas Cage already plagued the screen earlier this year in an action film, Season of the Witch, and here he is to violate our eyes and ears again. The premise for the film is rather flimsy, but it does have hints of the exploitation films of the 1970’s. RottenTomatoes has it at 63%, which is really surprising since Cage’s recent Tomatometer scores have been between 6% and 40%, but it is also early in the week, so I expect that to go down. To make matters worse, it is in 3D, so essentially whoever watches this will be paying twice as much to be more disappointed.

Limited Releases

Shelter

Rated: R

Starring: Julianne Moore, Jonathan Rhys Myers, Jeffrey DeMunn, Frances Conroy

Director: Mans Marlind, Bjorn Stein

Synopsis from IMDB: A female forensic psychiatrist discovers that all of one of her patient’s multiple personalities are murder victims. She will have to find out what’s happening before her time is finished.

Trailer:

Chris’ Take: For every The Kids are All Right, Julianne Moore has her The Forgotten. This one looks like she is returning to the latter rather than the former. While I did like Identity, I was hoping that the writer, Michael Cooney, would branch out a bit more because he has a lot of promise. Hopefully, this is still a fresh take on the schizophrenic thriller.

 

 

Kevin Costner’s Role in the Man of Steel

22 Feb

With Deadline reporting that there is increasing interest in casting Kevin Costner for an unspecified role in the Superman reboot coming to theaters in 2012, speculation has risen as to what role he might play.  Recent box office performances by Costner have not been stellar as he is no longer the draw he once was.  His most recent film, The Company Men, quietly grossed just over 3 million domestically despite an ensemble of recognizable names.  Fans can’t forget the powerhouse that Costner once was, starring in such films as The Untouchables, Bull Durham, Field of Dreams, Dances With Wolves, Robin Hood, JFK, and The Bodyguard; almost all in succession.  A summer blockbuster like Superman: The Man of Steel could be the picture Costner needs to catapult him back into billing relevance, but the role and the capacity in which he contributes is still unknown.  I’ve listed the potential roles for Costner and taken my best guess at who he may play.

1. Johnathan Kent

This seems the obvious choice for Costner by anyone who has seen Field of Dreams (and that should be everyone).  Costner has shown he can play the simple-man farmer role with great success while providing the wisdom and moral guidance that the elder Kent provides for Clark.  Costner seems like a Hollywood version of John Schneider, the actor who played Johnathan in Smallville.  The problem with Johnathan Kent is that depending on which comic version they draw from, his age can vary greatly.  Costner would surely fit the age demographic for the silver and golden age superman, but the modern age versions have the Kents as a bit older and gray-haired.  However, Johnathan Kent’s role could be very important to the film if they follow the Death of Superman storyline which includes my favorite choice of villain – Doomsday.

2. Perry White

Casting Costner as Perry White would be mean a large change from the Perry White of Superman Returns, Frank Langella.  27 years younger than Langella, Costner’s White could provide a little more fire to the role of the Daily Planet’s editor.  If don’t see Costner in the new media type of role consider this; Christopher Nolan has said that he wants to present Superman in a modern context.  Given the current state of the print media industry, having Costner trying to revive what was once the most respected source of news in Metropolis, during economic decline, doesn’t seem like too far a cry from his most recent work in The Company Men.

3. Jor-El

Since this role has only been played by one man in both the Donner films and Bryan Singer’s Superman Returns, Kevin Costner would have the large shoes of Marlon Brando to fill.  Jor-El’s almost god like stature doesn’t seem like the perfect fit for Costner, but the role has mostly been voice intensive in previous film incarnations and Costner could certainly do that.  Though he seems more working class than regal, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Costner play Jor-El.  Just as Nolan said he wanted to bring Superman to a modern context, he has also mentioned the innovation of the Donner films for casting big name actors in non-leading roles.  Nolan has done this for Batman films and Costner certainly is a big enough name for the role of Jor-El.

4. Ron Troupe or Steve Lombard

This would certainly apply to a big name in a non-leading role.  Little to unknown by fans of the films, the two characters listed above are both reporters for the Daily Planet.  Ron Troupe is political columnist and Steve Lombard is a Sports Journalist.  Neither character seems relevant enough (based on their description) to warrant the casting of an actor like Costner, but their role in the plot could make them relevant.  As co-workers of Clark Kent and observers of his daily activity as well as the heroic acts of Superman, either one of them could become suspicious of Clark as Superman’s other identity.  Remember that in some origins Clark was an outstanding football player, something a sports journalist like Steve Lombard would be familiar with.  Casting Costner as either of these characters would require some character alterations though, since Lombard is a bit younger and more athletic than Costner, and Troupe is black.

5. Potential Villain

Even though Christopher Nolan is only producing this film in a Godfather capacity, he surely has a say in the casting.  Leave it to him to shock speculators just as he did in 2008’s The Dark Knight and cast an actor out of left field to play the villain (I’m sure you know who I’m referring to).  We have rarely seen Costner in a devious role (Mr. Brooks) so playing a villain might be the breath of air his career needs.  It is still unclear who the primary adversary for Superman will be in this film and that is a whole new can of worms, but there are some roles that Costner may be a fit for.  He is almost certainly too old to play Lex Luthor in this incarnation, but what about the second-most well-known of Superman’s villains… 

General Zod Terrance Stamp was 42 when he portrayed Zod in Superman II, and even though Costner is well into his fifties he doesn’t look much older than Stamp did.  We mentioned earlier this month that Zod’s soldier Ursa would likely appear in this film, so it seems likely that Zod will appear as well.  Zod on Earth would have all the same abilities as Superman, and with the right amount of Kryptonian soldiers by his side, even Costner would seem imposing to the Man of Steel.

BraniacIt would take a lot of makeup or CGI to bring Braniac to life on-screen the way he appears in the comics, but this is a Zack Snyder film we’re talking about.  If that were the case, the most recognizable aspect of Kevin Costner as Braniac would be his voice; and as we mentioned with Jor-El, this would alleviate any doubt he could fill the physical presence the required for the role.  Braniac (as obvious by his name) is an intellectual foe to Superman and utilizes his vast knowledge and alien abilities to match strengths with Superman. 

DarkseidI’m hesitant to mention the words Kevin Costner and apocalypse in the same sentence for fear of bringing up memories of Waterworld but Darkseid is a villain who’s been in Superman lore for over 40 years and doesn’t get much love.  Costner as the alien from Apokolips is unlikely though, Apokolips would require a lot more physical confrontation with Superman than the previously mentioned villains and his physique is a lot more imposing.  However, there’s always CGI and the current incarnation of Darkseid in Smallville doesn’t seem to be staying true to the comic.  However, the very recent portrayal of Darkseid in Smallville also makes his appearance in the next film unlikely.

DoomsdayAnother physically imposing character for Superman to face, Doomsday is my preferred choice for a Superman villain.  Costner as Doomsday would require mostly voice (and possibly motion capture) acting as the alien has little human characteristics, so it is not out of the realm of possibilities.  Costner’s age may not be a concern if he were to play Doomsday either, keep in mind that Tim Roth played a similar role as The Abomination in 2008s The Incredible Hulk and he is only 6 years younger than Costner.  If the Doomsday storyline were to play out on film though, we’d likely see Costner in the role of Johnathan Kent.

At the moment though this is all speculation, one role among many that have yet to be announced for this film.  As we move closer to production for this film more and more of these announcements will come to light and the film’s plot will begin to take shape.  Superman: The Man of Steel is scheduled for release in December 2012.

RoboCop: A Remake I Can Stand Behind

21 Feb

“Part man. Part machine. All cop. The future of law enforcement.”  RoboCop was a 1987 film starring Peter Weller in the titular role and infamously featured Kurtwood Smith (That ’70s Show) as the villain Clarence J. Boddicker.  The plot of the film revolves around a fatally wounded cop who is turned into a powerful cyborg to fight crime in a futuristic and dystopian Detroit.  RoboCop was a critical and box office success that spawned two (less impressive) sequels and eventually became an iconic 1980s action flick.

For a while now, MGM has had RoboCop on its list of films to be rebooted/remade for the next generation.  Because of their legal problems, RoboCop and other pictures like The Hobbit and Bond 23 were put on hold.  The Hobbit and Bond 23 are once again greenlit and under production, while the future of RoboCop was still unclear.  However, Total Film reported over the weekend that MGM is now ready to move the film back into production. 

While I am more open to the reboot/remake craze than others, I still share the opinion that Hollywood has taken it a bit far.  However, if there was ever a time to remake an 80s classic like RoboCop, now is the time.  More than just an action flick, RoboCop was a prophetic satire on our own society.  Ripe with violence (especially by the film’s protagonist), RoboCop portrays a futuristic Detroit where the law enforcement is privatized while soulless and conscious-less machines are preferred over human interaction and judgment.  This kind of message seems more relevant today than ever; and with a backdrop of Detroit, the poster city for current U.S. hardship, RoboCop seems destined for resurrection.

Rise like the Phoenix

A reboot will surely provide an update to the stop-motion animation that was featured in the 1987 film; and while fanboys will surely groan at a CGI update, it will be exciting to see what 25 years of updated technology can provide to this film.  The biggest concern I see with the film is not the effects however, but the direction it decides to go.  As previously stated, RoboCop is much more than an action film.  In order to be successful, MGM has to be firm on maintaining the message and tone associated with the original (and keep the hard R rating).  Although Darren Aronofsky will likely not be involved because of his commitment to the Wolverine film, his rumored association to the project provides hope that the studio does want to remain faithful to the source material.  Here’s to hoping everything we loved about the first movie lives on in the remake because…

...Dead or alive, you're coming with me.

The Unnecessary Biopic: Glenn Close to Play Susan Boyle

21 Feb

The musical biopic has found its way to theaters many times over the past few years, frequently delivering as both box office and critical gold.  Some have gone the way of a very declarative and straightforward biopic (Ray, Walk the Line, Notorious) while others shroud their autobiographical state in fiction (Dreamgirls, I’m Not There, 8 Mile).  Regardless of how it is presented, these films attract the attention of a wide demographic of both music and film enthusiasts; and as with reboots/remakes, nostalgia seems to be a big enough box office draw to continue to get these films made.

The question that remains however, is where will Hollywood draw the line?  There are plenty of interesting stories by great musical artists that are still unmade; but for the business of making movies, it is not always about the story.  While I am reeling in anticipation for the Tupac biopic to hit theaters, it is one of many that are either in production or in-talks for production.  Other artists who may soon see their likeness on-screen include: Aretha Franklin, Miles Davis, Janis Joplin, Bob Marley, Iggy Pop, John Lennon, and Jerry Garcia among others.  But you don’t have to be dead, or even retired, to get a biopic of yourself made these days.

You just have to look like death

Then there’s the Susan Boyle biopic, the one no one asked for but is getting made anyway.  A reality TV star who made headlines for wowing audiences and judges on Britain’s Got Talent, Boyle is nothing more than a pop culture fad that many of us have forgotten.  Though she may be more revered in Britain than here in the states, her story still seems more unnecessary than the Justin Bieber movie that was released earlier this year.  These films seem to follow a formula, one that includes overcoming controversy or adversity to rise to legendary levels of fame.  What adversity has Susan Boyle, or Justin Bieber for that matter, overcome?  Being unattractive? Being Canadian?  It seems harsh but it is the truth; the only reason this woman was shocking enough to still be semi-relevant now is because no one expected a 60-year-old unattractive woman to sing as well as she did.  If she was a hot, 20 something she’d probably be nothing more than a runner-up to some guy with premature gray hair.

Katherine McPhee biopic coming in 2013

Somehow, big name talent is still interested in playing the 63-year-old Boyle and studios still think there is enough interest in the woman to greenlight this project.  Glenn Close (Fatal Attraction) is set to star in the film but she was not the first performer to show interest in the role.  The Daily Mail also reported that Catherine Zeta-Jones was interested, and so was Robin Williams.

Actually we can see how that one makes sense

I would tell you when this film plans to start production or when it is scheduled to be released in theaters, but frankly I’m not interested enough to look it up.  Chances are it will probably also be released in IMAX 3D so if you decide to pay your left arm to see this movie at least you’ll get to see (Glenn Close as) Susan Boyle in all her beauty – up close and in your face.

What are your thoughts on the upcoming Susan Boyle biopic?  Is this the most unnecessary biopic in recent memory?  Would you be interested in seeing this film when it comes to theaters?  Leave your comments below.

Weekend Film Recommendation: “Black Dynamite” (2009)

18 Feb

By Brian “Pac” Sostak

The parody genre has lost some of its luster in recent years after the successes of Scary Movie, Scary Movie 2, and Not Another Teen Movie led to a slew of knock-offs where the writers seemingly phoned it in for cheap laughs and PG-13 fart jokes.  Audiences can only fall for seeing Epic Movie, Disaster Movie, Date Movie, Meet the Spartans, and Vampires Suck so many times before they wear so thin they avoid the genre all together.  Unfortunately, when that happens a film like Black Dynamite falls through the cracks.

A spoof of 1970s blaxploitation films, Black Dynamite follows the titular character as he tries to track down his brother’s killer.  As he investigates the murder he learns that there is a conspiracy that goes a lot deeper than he bargained for.  In addition to its parodying of blaxploitation, the film also pays homage to the kung-fu genre that was also popular during the same time.  The film is littered with recognizable faces (but not so much names) such as its star Michael Jai White (The Dark Knight, Spawn), Tommy Davidson (In Living Color), Miguel A. Núñez Jr. (Juwanna Man), John Salley, and Arsenio Hall. 

What separates Black Dynamite from other blaxploitation spoofs such as Undercover Brother and I’m Gonna Get You Sucka is the authenticity to the era.  The cinematography, score, effects, and deadpan delivery replicate the films of the era it’s mocking, and with a runtime of only 84 minutes it never wears thin.  The film pulls no punches with its crude language, sexuality, or adult humor; but it is all with reason as it fits into the well-crafted design.

Though the film only had a limited 2 week release in theaters, it was picked up for distribution after the high praise it received at Sundance in 2009.  Following Sundance it won best picture at  the Seattle International Film Festival, beating out the Academy’s choice for best picture that year, The Hurt Locker.  As with all of our weekend film recommendations, Black Dynamite is available instantly on Netflix.  So if you’re looking for a fun and relaxing way to spend and hour and a half this weekend crack a forty and have a laugh while watching Black Dynamite take down the man.

Just be careful what brand you buy

Trailer:

**Trailer Time** Arthur & A New Thor Trailer

18 Feb

The drag of January and February in movie selections and movie news continues to plague us but with only a little over a week until the Academy Awards, we’ll soon begin our ramp up to the spring and summer.  The blockbuster season can’t come soon enough, and two films that fall near the beginning of that season are beginning their marketing campaigns with brand new trailers:

Arthur

A remake of the 1981 film starring Dudley Moore in the titular role, this film stars Russell Brand as a drunken rich playboy whose inheritance becomes in jeopardy when he falls in love with a woman his family doesn’t approve of.  Adding to the list of remakes that no one asked for, Arthur not only stars Brand but also Jennifer Garner, making that two stars I dont’ care for on-screen.  However, Brand seems to be a good fit for this character and may show a little more range than he has in previous roles.  Helen Mirren rounds out the cast as she ventures back into comedy after RED, and seems to be a pleasant addition.

Thor

A second trailer was released for Thor but nothing about it convinces me the film we be anything more than a stepping stone to the upcoming Avengers movie.  The first half of the trailer unfortunately featured a heavy dose of Kat Dennings (Nick and Norah’s Infinite Playlist) who seemed to be Jane Foster’s (Natalie Portman’s) friend/comic relief.  On the plus side, this trailer features a lot more Asgard than the first trailer, which appears to be where the more interesting parts of the film take place.  Also in the trailer is the introduction of Loki as the primary villain from the film, something that was left to ambiguity in the first trailer.  Finally, this trailer features a lot more Natalie Portman than the first released trailer, which always captures my undivided attention.



TAKE TWO: The Rite (2011)

16 Feb

The Rite

Rated: PG-13

Starring: Colin O’Donoghue, Anthony Hopkins, Alice Braga, Rutger Hauer

Director: Mikael Hafstrom

Chris’ Take: My most anticipated films of the year have taken huge hits and we are not even two months into 2011. The Rite was #9 on my most anticipated films, and while I wasn’t expecting a whole lot from it, I certainly expected more than the lopsided effort from Mikael Hafstrom.

To escape the oppression of his father’s funeral home, Michael Kovak (Colin O’Donoghue) decides to go to Catholic seminary. After his 4 years, he still struggles from lack of faith, so he is sent to an exorcism school in the Vatican. While he is there, the instructor (Ciaran Hinds) places him under the unorthodox tutelage of Father Trevant (Anthony Hopkins). As Michael views the exorcism process up close, his doubts begin to dwindle and his faith is ultimately challenged when he comes face to face with true evil.

The film clocks in at about two hours, but really takes an hour and a half to get around to anything interesting. A lot of the film’s problems stem from this tragedy of pacing. Mikael Hafstrom showed his skill at maintaining a feverish psychological atmosphere in 1408, and while there are glimpses of that in this film, particularly during one scene at a hostel, they aren’t maintained enough to truly disturb the viewer.

Maybe Hafstrom would've felt more at home if the whole film took place in a hotel room.

Instead Hafstrom, fills his time going for cheap and jolting thrills instead of bringing anything smart or innovative to the screen.  

Anthony Hopkins, as usual, is brilliant. The man just knows how to create interesting characters out of a mediocre script. His perfection at inflecting at all the right points in a sentence really shines through in his performance, and this really was his most disturbing role since playing Hannibal Lecter. The problem for Hopkins is that he is surrounded by weak actors in every scene; his genius gets lost in those around him. O’Donaghue did well in the climax of the film, but unfortunately spent the rest of the film making me not give two hoots about his character, making even his best moments seem hollow. The only other people who could match acting ability with Hopkins, Hauer and Hinds, were kept far away from him. I do have to say that Marta Gastini, an Italian actress, who played the part of a possessed pregnant girl, gave an incredible performance. But, like a lot of other good parts of the film, her scenes were too few and far between.

Do you see that man behind me? Could you give him acting lessons?

There was nothing incredibly spectacular in the artistry of the film. I expected a little bit more than the exorcism films of late, and while it was slightly better, it wasn’t anything too noticeable. The cinematography was predictable and the sounds were primarily centered around a persistent rumbling, similar to that of the demon in Paranormal Activity, but was unable to convey the sense of dread that they were going for.

While it was better than most exorcism efforts of the last ten years, it still fell far short of the precedent of other demonic possession films such as The Omen and The Exorcist. I do enjoy a good religious horror film, but they are grasping at straws to be disturbing and maybe it is time to go back to the drawing board to bring life back to this dying genre.

  • Performances: Hopkins and Gastini (A-) Everyone Else (C)
  • Cinematography: B-
  • Directing: C+
  • Plot: C+
  • Characters: C
  • OVERALL: C+

Pac’s Take:  The Rite is a complete rollercoaster ride.  Wait around for an hour and a half, a few moments of ramp up, a quick moment of excitement, and all of a sudden the ride is over.  Even an Anthony Hopkins ride-a-long couldn’t save the pacing of this movie.  I understand that characterization is essential to a film, but there’s only so much time you need to spend on developing a pessimistic priest with daddy issues before you begin to beat a dead mule.

The most interesting part of the entire film was Hopkin’s character, which was not on-screen for all that much of the film.  Even before his possession, his interactions with the possessed girl (Gastani) were gripping even despite the fact that Michael Kovak (O’Donoghue) was also taking up space in the scene.  Kovak was once rumored to be up for the part of Superman in the upcoming Man of Steel and it may have been his lifeless performance in this film that led to Cavill’s casting.  There were scenes when his performance (or lack there of) was not as noticeable, but that can probably be attributed to increased cinematic suspense, or the other actors on-screen (namely Hopkins) carrying him through. 

By the grace of God Colin O’Donoghue, I absolve you of this performance

It is unfortunate that the first of my most anticipated films of 2010 fell short of the bar I set for it, but hopefully as the months go on the quality of work will only get better.  It is February after all, a notoriously slow month for movie releases, and apparently plot progression.

 
  • Performances: B-
  • Cinematography: B-
  • Directing: C-
  • Plot: C
  • Characters: C-
  • OVERALL: C
 

Ice Cube is Keeping Himself Busy

16 Feb

The headlining news from the Ice Cube camp is that he is in negotiations to join the cast of 21 Jump Street.  If he were to join the full length feature adaptation of the popular ’80s televsion show that launched the career of Johnny Depp, he would be cast as the precinct captain.  Since the film will follow the series plot about a group of undercover cops that infiltrate schools, it seems to be one of the few logical roles for Ice Cube in the film.  However, the film also boasts stars Jonah Hill (27) and Channing Tatum (30), two actors a little too far removed from the halls of high school themselves.

21 Jump Street is hardly the end of the list of upcoming projects for Ice Cube.  Also in the works is Chrome and Paint, Cube’s next directorial effort.  Chrome and Paint will feature the subculture of “tricked out cars” featured in L.A. and will boast a cinematic style similar to Boyz N’ The Hood, Ice Cube’s feature debut.  It’d be nice to see Ice Cube shy away from the family friendly comedies he’s been focusing on the past six or seven years; however, it is hard to imagine a Boyz N’ The Hood style drama about tricked out cars, it seems like something that could easily turn into the next Torque…

Or a gritty Snoop Dogg video

 

Third on the long list of upcoming Ice Cube projects is a crime film in the same vein as Dirty Harry, starring the former rapper.  The film will be directed by David O Russell, and will be produced by New Line Cinema and Cube Vision (Ice Cube’s entertainment company).  This film will reteam Cube and David O Russell for the first time since 1999’s Three Kings.  David O Russell’s short filmography speaks for itself (Three Kings, I Heart Huckabees, The Fighter) and as long as Ice Cube doesn’t reach for the action star role like he did in XXX: State of the Union, this could be a great venture.

And maybe not too much like a Dirty Harry film

Finally, Ice Cube will be producing a biopic about his politically charged 80s hip hop group NWA.  Not much is currently known about this upcoming project but the script is currently being penned by Andrea Berloff (World Trade Center).  It seems that the biopic craze has hit the hip hop genre with Notorious in 2009, the Antoine Fuqua directed Tupac biopic, and now an NWA film in the works.  At least Hollywood picked three of the most interesting artists in the genre to feature on the silver-screen, let’s just hope they don’t take it too far.

I thought they already did an NWA biopic

Mitch Hurwitz’s Guide to Getting a Sitcom Cancelled

16 Feb

Arrested Development is arguably one of the best TV sitcoms of all time. Its unique characters and smart script, that many times rewarded faithful viewers by setting up jokes with punch lines several episodes later, set a standard for other shows to follow. The mystery has always been why it never garnered the viewership during its 3 season run (one season winning the Emmy for Best Comedy Series) to keep it alive. Mitch Hurwitz, the writer of the show, also had several other shows get cancelled after short runs on TV, the most recent being Running Wilde. He recently wrote an article for the UK Newspaper, The Guardian, entitled Guide to Getting a Sitcom Cancelled which satires his own success, or lack thereof:

Have a confusing title

Come up with an unwieldy title that perhaps comes from the realm of psychology, so that the title of your show is almost instantly forgettable. For example, if you were to call the show Welcome Matt, an audience could immediately understand the concept: this must be a character named Matt and he must either be a welcoming person or stepped on. If you call a show Arrested Development it’s confusing and sufficiently disorientating to guarantee that a wide audience never discovers the fruits of your labor.

Audiences love fast cars and exciting vehicles

So see if you can put in some heavy machinery like a stair-car, that isn’t easily associated with speed or sex appeal.

Try to do too much for a 20-minute programme

If in your particular medium an audience is used to a simple plotline or maybe one or two stories, see if you can get eight in there, and find a way that they somehow intertwine. Also, it’s important that you have a lot of anxiety when they don’t intertwine, sufficient to deprive yourself of sleep so that you are miserable during the production of the show – but then upon completion of the show, you’re guaranteed to be miserable, because nobody will watch it.

Add a sprinkle of incest

They’ll never admit it, but viewers love sex. In fact, they love any sort of titillation, with the exception of incest. So focus on that.

First impressions are everything

So if you can screw that up, you’re made. With Arrested Development, we tried showing the deep disdain that connects a family. We wanted to hold up a mirror to American society. And, just as predicted, America looked away.

Don’t be afraid to give characters the same names

Audiences tend to run from confusion. So a show, for instance, where one character is named George Michael, one character is named Michael, one character is named George and one character is named George Oscar (and perhaps another character is named Oscar), will be the kind of show you can almost guarantee people won’t develop a fondness for.

Make easy jokes about minority groups

Whether they be Mexicans, Jews or homosexuals, any group can be dismissed with a few stereotypical cracks. At least, that’s what we tried to do. And given their “lack of coming to the party”, it seems we succeeded!

Squander iconic guest stars

As an example, Liza Minnelli has famously appealed to the homosexual audience. Note: it’s very important to alienate the homosexual audience first, or they might “come to the party”.

Don’t bother with a laughter track

Audiences don’t always know “when to laugh”. By omitting a laugh track you can almost guarantee they’ll never find out.

Audiences like nicely dressed characters. They also enjoy nudity

Split the difference by putting your character in a pair of cut-offs and call him a Never-Nude. Advanced: feel free to dip him in a vat of blue paint. That’s a real turn-off.

Make a show for British sensibilities

And then show it in America.

An Open Letter to Antoine Fuqua

15 Feb

Dear Mr. Fuqua,

I apologize for publishing this letter in a public forum, but despite numerous attempts over the weekend none of my voicemails have been returned.  First of all, if you are reading this allow me to say thank you for visiting our page.  Chris and I are always excited to find those associated with the industry that fuels our work pay attention to the voice of the consumer, even if it is mostly hate mail from Nicolas Cage.

Dear Chris, I hate your stinking guts. You make me vomit. You're scum between my toes! Love, Nicolas.

I can’t express to you how excited I was to hear that you will soon be directing a biopic on Tupac Shakur.  As I have previously expressed on this site, Tupac is my favorite musical artist, one I have followed since my childhood.  I cannot think of any other director I would prefer to bring his life story to the big screen for this generation of movie goers.  As I understand it, Mr. Fuqua, the role of Tupac Shakur has yet to be cast and with shooting to begin in April/May I’m sure you are actively pursuing a suitable actor for that role.  I would like to officially enter myself for consideration.

To ensure that my candidacy for the role is taken seriously, allow me to tell you a little bit about myself.  I am a 25 year old white male who currently lives in Virginia Beach, Va.  I am 5’10” tall and weigh approximately 165 lbs.  While I have no cinematic film experience, I once played Martin Vanderhof in a high school adaptation of “You Can’t Take it With You”.  I apologize for not including a headshot with this letter but you know how it is for bloggers these days, if the world knew what I looked like it’d only be a matter of time before I was assaulted by Will.I.Am.

I can't believe Will.I.Am did that to his hair...

Now I know what you’re thinking after reading that description, 25 is the perfect age for the role.  I am aware that Tupac was tragically gunned down at the age of 25, and as your film will primarily focus on the last days of his life, I fit the age demographic perfectly.  However, that is not the only attribute that should be acknowledged when considering me for this role.  I have compiled a short list of things that you may want to take into account.

Height and Weight

As I said previously, I am currently 5’10” tall and approximately 165 lbs.  At the time of Tupac’s arrest for sexual assault he was listed as 5’11” but in actually he was closer to 5’9” -5’10” tall.  Also, chronicled in the popular Tupac song “Str8 Ballin” is the lyric:

“And they say how do you survive weighin’ 165”

This of course is referring to the weight of the late rapper, which coincidentally is identical to my own.

 

Life Experiences

While I cannot argue that my life experiences were identical to the rappers, as an actor I am able to use my own life experiences to identify with some of the hardships he went through.  For example, Tupac’s mother was a high ranking Black Panther who was arrested and imprisoned while she was pregnant with him.  She stood trial without representation and pleaded her own case.  She was subsequently found not guilty and released.  My mother experienced a similar incident, one that shaped both my perception of her and my own life in the process.  She was kicked out of the PTA when I was in second grade for laughing at a student during a spelling bee.  She was found to be in violation of no rules or regulations after petitioning the board, as apparently it is not inappropriate to laugh at a child during a PTA event if you gave birth to said individual.

That's not fair! Rizzuto's not a word! He's a baseball player!

In 1994, Tupac was shot five times coming out of an elevator at Time Square’s Quad Studios in New York City.  Recently, I decided to independently re-enact the incident with my fifteen year old brother (I take my method acting very seriously).  As I was taking the trash out during a visit to his house, my brother unexpectedly shot me five times with his unregistered Crosman C11 BB Gun.  There has been a long standing beef between us ever since, chronicled through various diss records.

Karl Kani jeans sold seperately

 

Influences and Legal Controversy

While I have never been incarcerated, had any wrongful death lawsuits brought against me, or been the center of congressional hearings; I, like Tupac, have been the center of some legal controversy.  In 2002 I took a high school literature class entitled “Great Works”.  During the class, we were required to read and write an analysis on Niccolò Machiavelli‘s “The Prince”.  Up until this point in the class, all of my previous papers had been returned with perfect marks.  Coming under fire from my classmates that my teacher showed me favoritism because she was a fan of my slam poetry program on the morning announcements, I decided to submit this paper under the alias Lesane Parish Crooks.  Although the paper received an “A”, I was given a failing grade because my teacher had no proof that I had written the paper.  When given the opportunity to resubmit the paper, I submitted the same paper under my own name assuming she’d then realize I was the original author.  Instead I was found guilty of plagiarizing Lesane Parish Crooks.  I was sentenced to two weeks detention for the infraction where I wrote a “coming of age” screenplay.

Physical Appearance

Even though I’m the same height and weight as the late rapper, I understand that my physical appearance may not be identical.  It has taken years of counseling but I do realize that I am white, something that may present a challenge when playing this role.  However, as any film enthusiast knows, Kirk Lazarus received his unprecedented sixth Academy Award for playing Sergeant Lincoln Osiris in Tropic Blunder: The True Story Behind The Making Of The Most Expensive Fake True War Movie Ever.  I have attempted to contact Kirk about the skin pigmentation procedure he underwent for that film but have yet to hear back from his people.  I’m sure that casting me in the role as Tupac would garner the same attention from the Academy that Kirk received. 

I don't read the script, the script reads me

 

Mr. Fuqua, I hope that after reading this letter you can agree that there is no better individual for the role of Tupac Shakur in your upcoming film than myself.  If my argument has not completely convinced you, I would be more than happy to accompany you to South America where we can ask Tupac in person.

 Sincerely,

Brian “Pac” Sostak

New to Blu-Ray/DVD this Week (February 15, 2011)

15 Feb

In addition to the weekly description of the theatrical releases, Chris and I decided that it may beneficial to our readers if we outlined the various releases to DVD/Blu Ray each Tuesday.  We realize through our own experiences that it is much easier to catch a movie through Netflix, rental, or purchase than it is to see in theaters; and like with our theatrical release post we hope this makes your home viewing experience a little more enjoyable.  Check back every Tuesday for the current releases.

You Will Meet a Tall Dark Stranger

Rated: R (language)

Starring: Anthony Hopkins, Naomi Watts, and Josh Brolin

Director: Woody Allen

Synopsis from IMDB:  Follows a pair of married couples, Alfie (Hopkins) and Helena (Gemma Jones), and their daughter Sally (Watts) and husband Roy (Brolin), as their passions, ambitions, and anxieties lead them into trouble and out of their minds. After Alfie leaves Helena to pursue his lost youth and a free-spirited call girl named Charmaine, Helena abandons rationality and surrenders her life to the loopy advice of a charlatan fortune-teller. Unhappy in her marriage, Sally develops a crush on her handsome art gallery owner boss, Greg (Antonio Banderas), while Roy, a novelist nervously awaiting the response to his latest manuscript, becomes moon struck over Dia (Freida Pinto), a mystery woman who catches his gaze through a nearby window.

Trailer:

Pac’s Take:  With a 46% rating on Rotten Tomatoes and a 39% user review, this film doesn’t appear to be one of Woody Allen’s better works.  Critics penned the film as underwhelming and formulaic, although I think this adequately describes the RomCom genre in which Allen has made a living.  Caught in the middle of The Wolfman and The Rite, this seems to be another film starring Anthony Hopkins that has missed the mark either because of, or despite his performance.  However, with such a highly regarded cast and an experienced director behind the scenes, I’m sure you could do a lot worse with your rental money.

Unstoppable

Rated: PG-13

Starring: Denzel Washington, Chris Pine and Rosario Dawson

Director: Tony Scott

Synopsis from IMDB:  With an unmanned, half-mile-long freight train barreling toward a city, a veteran engineer and a young conductor race against the clock to prevent a catastrophe.

Trailer:

Pac’s Take:  Unstoppable is the only film on this week’s release schedule that I have seen, and thus have more than just reviews and speculation to comment on.  An early fall release that shockingly received high critical praise, Unstoppable is the second straight train movie on Tony Scott’s filmography.  Unlike The Taking of Pelham 123, no one seemed to phone in their performances.  Light on the story and heavy on the action, this film does not disappoint as a straight adrenaline filled action movie.  It should be noted that this film featured actual trains and real stunts, a welcome substitute to the overabundance of CGI in today’s movies.

Waiting for Superman

Rated: PG

Starring: The Black Family, Geoffrey Canada and The Esparza Family

Director: Davis Guggenheim

Synopsis from IMDB:  Filmmaker Davis Guggenheim reminds us that education “statistics” have names: Anthony, Francisco, Bianca, Daisy, and Emily, whose stories make up the engrossing foundation of WAITING FOR SUPERMAN. As he follows a handful of promising kids through a system that inhibits, rather than encourages, academic growth, Guggenheim undertakes an exhaustive review of public education, surveying “drop-out factories” and “academic sinkholes,” methodically dissecting the system and its seemingly intractable problems.

Trailer:

Pac’s Take:  This is the film among this week’s releases that I look forward to seeing most.  While many documentaries do not peak my interest, Waiting for Superman takes a look at a worthy topic in the American education system.  Because it is a documentary and because of its content, this is probably not the most enjoyable or lighthearted film to watch among this crop.  However, if you want a more intellectual watch this week, Waiting for Superman appears to be a worthy choice.

Glorious 39

Rated:  R

Starring: Romola Garai, Eddie Redmayne and Juno Temple

Director: Stephen Poliakoff

Synopsis from IMDB:  A mysterious tale set around a traditional British family on the eve of World War Two.

Trailer:

Pac’s Take:  With only a limited release in the UK, this DVD/Blu Ray release is the first opportunity for U.S. viewers to see this film.  I become hesitant with any film that receives a straight to DVD release, but sometimes these movies can surprise you (i.e. Trick ‘r Treat).  Regardless, with a 48% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, Glorious 39 seems to be a long-winded period film disguised a suspense thriller.